In the recent literature there is intensive discussion of paradoxical properties of the BH Event Horizon. The question arises about possibility to construct such alternative gravitation theory which can predict existence of compact relativistic objects without event horizon.
Hi Yurij,
Based on my model I have derived an alternative http://www.toebi.com/blog/theory-of-everything-by-illusion/black-holes-by-toebi/
Dear Kimmo,
I have seen your reference and my conclusion is that your speaking is complete nonsense.
Science is not a dish of gossip! So I recommend you do not begrime the true scientific work by your free illusions.
The best example of how physical theory is constructed you may find in the Landau & Lifshitz first and second volumes of the Theoretical Physics. Especially for gravity physics you may see Richard Feynman’s “Lectures on Gravitation”.
To construct a new physical theory one should incorporate all existing well established physical facts, and then to predict results of new (achievable for near future) crucial experiments which are able to distinguish a new theory from existing one.
@Yurij
Thanks for your tips (I really mean that). Actually, my paper on antimatter gives us something new as well as testable. If you do have the facilities to try it out, don't do it, without certain precaution measurements there might a new gamma ray burst event originated on Earth.
I have proposed a concept of quasi-black hole in my cosmological model, because the model has proved that a true black hole can not be formed.
I don't know whether this kind of theoretical assumption can be academically correlated or not. Regarding black holes, I feel that only gravitation alone cannot be capable of creating such enigmatic and gigantic messes in the space. There is a possibility that, somehow, anti-material properties of atoms and molecules become over-manifested in and around a black hole. Hence, humans in this universe are observing a crippling effect that appears to be happening under a collapse-oriented influence of gravitation. But the actual situation out there may not be like that. And when I talk about something 'anti-material', I want to say that it is about the anti-matter. That is like imagining opposite spins with respect to a spinning subatomic particle. That is also like imagining, or postulating, that negative charge quantities in the universe should compensate positive charge quantities and vice versa. Please have a look of some new theories around black holes:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0405231
http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.00305
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1409.2369
Kinmo advertises "electrons as a building blocks of our universe" One guy from Mac Donald advertises protons as a building blocks of the universe. Who is right Kimmo or Mac Donald guy? Protons are as nice as electrons. So... Roy Lisker will answer that question. .
Preprint New version of the general theory of relativity (Initial pri...
An alternative solution of the General Relativity - Valery Morozov's solution is the same as my solution. No singularities, no event horizons, bodies scaled to their miniatyres.