Are the Amazon forests considered the breath of the earth?
The great forests of the earth such as the Amazon and Southeast Asia such as Borneo and the tropical forests of Africa, next to the Congo River, may be mentioned as the breathing of the earth. Because every broad leaf (broad leaves) is a factory of oxygen production on the planet and this humus brings the forest in nature. But unfortunately, some countries like Brazil have started to destroy forests and have livestock farming, especially cattle farming, to produce beef. . In Brazil, where they have destroyed the Amazon forests and started cattle ranches instead, they have destroyed both the vegetation and the soil of the forest. And the cows themselves, because they have 4 stomachs, produce methane gas in the air, which destroys the ozone layer.
Isn't it time to prevent the destruction of broadleaf forests?
Yeas, of course, the Amazon forests are considered the breath of the earth
The answer to your question is yes; the Amazon, often referred to as the “Lungs of the Earth,” is the breath of the Earth because it plays a crucial role in the world’s carbon cycle. The forest absorbs carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and, through photosynthesis, converts it into oxygen.
However, it’s important to note that while the Amazon is a significant source of oxygen, it’s not the only one. About 50% of all photosynthesis, and thus oxygen production, occurs in the oceans, thanks to phytoplankton and algae. So, while the Amazon is vital, it’s part of a larger global ecosystem contributing to the Earth’s “breathing” process.
The health of the Amazon is of global concern because its destruction could exacerbate climate change, reduce biodiversity, and disrupt regional weather patterns. Therefore, efforts to conserve and sustainably manage the Amazon are crucial for the health of our planet.
Daer Jorge Morales Pedraza
- University degrees in Mathematics and in Economics
- Senior Consultant at Morales Project Consulting
Austria
thank you for your answer. Thanks Abbas
Will the regional wars that use nuclear bombs and phosphorous bombs remain in the earth's atmosphere and affect the future generation of humans?
New
Question
Be the first to answer
- Asked 8 days ago
Will the regional wars that use nuclear bombs and phosphorous bombs remain in the earth's atmosphere and affect the future generation of humans?
According to the opinion of biological and biological scientists as well as meteorologists, they believe that nuclear bombs and prohibited chemical and phosphorous bombs and bombs weakened by nuclear radioactivity are used. In the future, these bombs will penetrate into the earth's soil and penetrate into the water cycle of the region, the hydrological cycle of the region, and will cause irreparable damage to the environment and the food resources that are used by humans and animal and plant creatures, and will affect their generations. and it is possible that their generation will be cut off and they may not have arms and legs. And this alleged witness can be done after the Second World War, which the United States of America carried out after the nuclear bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima, Japan. According to meteorologists, these nuclear particles remain in the earth's atmosphere for up to 50 years and cause the Japanese generation to die. It has been since then. The question is whether now that nuclear countries like the United States of America and Israel are using weakened radioactive and phosphorous bombs, will there be environmental effects and nuclear pollution on the future generation of Iraq, Syria, and Palestine? have taken ? Does their drinking water lead to nuclear and radioactive effects that lead to the end of their generation? Does the environment and the earth's atmosphere, which is circulating and may send radioactive particles to places where they were not at all, but the effects Will the war reach them and cause genetic damage?
Bombs
Nuclear
Iraq
World War II
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Correction