Several theories including Dunning's eclectic paradigm, transaction cost theory, the Uppsala model, network approach, and more have, over the years, been used to explain the international expansion of firms.
Certainly.. at least to some extent, however, as theories are always generalizations of reality, a behavior of a specific firm may not completely follow only one theory: e.g. a firm may have some characteristics described in the Uppsala model but, at the same time, also some described in the born global literature (e.g. start internationalizing from a few closest countries but also go to 1 distant market very fast but not reach a 25% export share). So, you might find some factors described in these theories useful, but you might also find that it is impossible to predict a particular firm's behavior using 1 or more of these theories.
Agreed with Dr. Tiia Vissak, there is no marked comparison or explanation which of the mentioned theories is suitable for internationalization. Each theory has its own particular shortcomings; therefore the scholars support the integration of several theoretical approaches in order to get better understanding.