Dear Eric, extra interesting question, that not the every is paying attention,

for my opinion you hardly find the pure experiment (even cheetah has aposematic stripes behind the mouth like a toud), but take into consideration that influence exist only when you have statistically proved reply on the affect! So, just ability or possibility cannot take into consideration! As well note, if exist some type of mimicry. The only emslian mimicry is acting both directions! Others are not bidirectional. 

Interesting, but ladybugs can differ the genera of themselves when overwintering! Being in Ukraine at my village house I saw different species in groups of dozens specimens of 4-5-6 species at the garret! In spring they appear in my kitchen and rooms and I'm saving touthands of them every year.. But now I'm living in Bangkok. How the'll survive without my help? ... Can tell me about smthing?

Andrey

Dear  Eric (to Alexsandra too)

I am not specialist but I would like share with you some reflections. As I understand Aposematic is a phenomenon pure defensive like color bright to avoid predators. However, my thinking always was related with the real effects in different predator with different vision. Important is if the animals have nocturnal or diurnal. During the night the color are without effect. I have doubt if the natural selection could be work for several predators in the same time. If predators are close related, ok, could be, but not for others. Some predator could be blind to colors or few colors. If the aposematic character could fixed for predators is because they are physiologically capable to detect this color bright. The question is if the effect could be the same for the species mate and if could impact or change the interspecific behavior. I think that important variables of any experiment is consider the vision of the counterpart (predator or mate). Some interesting test could be produce artificial changes of the color of the target species with innocuous dyes or produce artificial and temporal blindness in predator or mate. I think that some time the interpretation is anthropological and the effect of hazard is diminished.