First of all, you have to check your data through plotting, if which has trend and intercept you could use the trend and intercept in ADF test. Therefore, your ADF test depends on the natures of your data
Assume 1 and t are included and the t in statistically insignificant, what is the null hypothesis associated with the t? I have no problem with plotting variables although my preference is starting with a full model.
Testing for stationarity can be quite tricky. It's best to start off running the test with trend and intercept and then evaluate the significance of the components. Plotting can indeed help with the initial assumptions but I wouldn't trust it too much (you cannot observe a zero trend or intercept, for instance). In addition you could run tests with only intercept and trend and without both, respectively, and then compare information criteria (AIC, BIC, LL). In the best case, you won't have to worry about much as the components are either significant or the information criteria point towards the same model. In any cases of doubt you might want to err on the side of non-stationarity. In this respect, it's sometimes useful to run a KPSS test in addition to the standard ADF test, as it tests the opposite null, I.e. stationarity. Hope this helps.
it depend to your variables. intercept is better to be in the model.but the relation to intercept, if variables have been trend, should include trend in your model.