Hi Mahammad

Please have a look into the paper below (Merad et al., 2013). It is downloadable from google scholar (see link below).

However, as explained by the authors it is very difficult to construct a model which includes all factors on micro-, meso and macro level that are crucial for a stable model.

Regards

Roland

https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/44827574/Using_a_multi-criteria_decision_aid_meth20160417-18888-6hm78r.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1550073601&Signature=0jxnbgKnnrzakFY9q01bjxJRKLI%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DUsing_a_multi-criteria_decision_aid_meth.pdf

Literature:

Merad, M., Dechy, N., Serir, L., Grabisch, M., & Marcel, F. (2013). Using a multi-criteria decision aid methodology to implement sustainable development principles within an organization. European Journal of Operational Research, 224(3), 603-613.

I would like to recommend reading the following article:

- Roy Ballantyne, Jan Packer, and Karen Hughes (2009) Tourists’ support for conservation messages and sustainable management practices in wildlife tourism experiences, Tourism Management, 30, pp. 658–664.

Good Day, Mohammad. The open-access article below applies Scholz's SVIDT-Methodology (Strengths, Vulnerability, Intervention Assessment related to Digital Threats) to look at the sustainability of Knowledge Management (KM). It focuses on the sustainability of Personal KM systems, processes, and outcomes in response to SVIDT’s concerns with goals, environments, actors, affiliations, strengths, weaknesses, synergies, strategies, threat and intervention scenarios.

Article Rationalizing a Personalized Conceptualization for the Digit...

Thank you very much. Appreciate it Roland Kaulbars Mahfuz Judeh Ulrich Schmitt