In my answer, I gather some personal experiences. All research must begin with an in-depth study of the topic and a bibliographic analysis of the research topic is required, this will be very useful later to elaborate the introduction of the work, in the discussion of the results or in the conclusions (especially if in our work we propose an alternative methodology, we propose a modification of a published method or we develop classic results in a new context, for example). The job title must clearly capture the essence of our proposal. The summary should describe in a concise and clear way the objectives, the elements that we develop and the results. The fundamental body of the document has to show the reader, clearly and precisely, what we have really developed, so that the scope, potential or novelty of the research can be evaluated. If necessary we can include notes or remarks, for the sake of a better understanding of the content. Although the work may be theoretical in nature, some examples can be presented to clarify concepts or theorems. The presentation of the results and their discussion is essential, so you should choose a suitable support to do so. The conclusions should give the reader the measure and scope of the research carried out, and may also refer to the future direction of our research. As for references, one should include all the bibliographic material used and the key publications in the research area.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335723296_RESEARCH_METHODOLOGY_A_COMPREHENSIVE_VIEW?_sg=qWy0EPdnpIHVLZnsWRvE8IxGw_dF7-bhxyJPYHkHKpdpvWyN9j6HItxrGOcolnzXYmLqNGEaGoXCkFm3Y6xoBGQ3DcspAVPBtIXofz2V.A_tue97a4xYm1tBrkLdZeZWokaEvgL-sM8tIA7QEXOxNGp-NRZVagcCT1dVWu7Pqkoyo6dde-tzEfrxE6SZrdw

Please look at this useful resource:

https://www.elsevier.com/__data/promis_misc/edurevReviewPaperWriting.pdf

Dear Kamila Ghidouche ait-yahia ,

First, you should write brief and concise introduction about the research topic importance and challenges. Then, you should comprehensively discuss the current related work in your research topic. In addition, you should summarize the limitations of the current related work and how your proposed system/model will overcome these/some of these limitations. After that, you should clearly discuss your proposed model in detail. In the experimental results section, you should present the experiments that were conducted to assess your model. Besides, you should discuss your results and compare it with other state-of-the-art techniques/systems. Finally, you should conclude your work and discuss our future research directions.

Biodiversity is an important topic, but often you won't know what is valuable until you start the research or field work

In my answer, I gather some personal experiences. All research must begin with an in-depth study of the topic and a bibliographic analysis of the research topic is required, this will be very useful later to elaborate the introduction of the work, in the discussion of the results or in the conclusions (especially if in our work we propose an alternative methodology, we propose a modification of a published method or we develop classic results in a new context, for example). The job title must clearly capture the essence of our proposal. The summary should describe in a concise and clear way the objectives, the elements that we develop and the results. The fundamental body of the document has to show the reader, clearly and precisely, what we have really developed, so that the scope, potential or novelty of the research can be evaluated. If necessary we can include notes or remarks, for the sake of a better understanding of the content. Although the work may be theoretical in nature, some examples can be presented to clarify concepts or theorems. The presentation of the results and their discussion is essential, so you should choose a suitable support to do so. The conclusions should give the reader the measure and scope of the research carried out, and may also refer to the future direction of our research. As for references, one should include all the bibliographic material used and the key publications in the research area.

In addition to what Francisco Martínez González said.

It is necessary to develop your own research approach based on a synthesis of the methodology and methodology for the study of a representative set of sources needed to study your problem.

Jaydip Datta thank your for sharing this paper, Francisco Martínez González Andrey Skorobogatov your advices are so useful thank you for your precious help :)

Mohammed Elmogy thank you for taking time to answer :) good luck. Hassan Izzeddin Sarsak thank you for sharing this document.

Reading and comprehension is the key !!!

Thank you Aparna Sathya Murthy

It starts with a thorough literature survey. This should start from the earliest known work noting that many such work may not be found via Google search. Then set up a logical pattern of reviewing them, either based on chronology or by theme. This can help one build a strong theoretical paper where the author should emphasize his/her proposition based on a theoretical framework comparing and contrasting the new theory versus what has already been talked about.

dear Nirmala S.V.S.G

Please see the following links

1. how to frame your contribution to knowledge? - Open Journal ...

https://ojs.bibsys.no › index.php › Nokobit › article › view

2. What Constitutes a Theoretical Contribution? - Semantic Scholar

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org › ..

I think you should first indicate the field in which you are working. How you should proceed would be quite different in philosophy, history, English literature, mathematics, crop science, or chemistry.

Karl Pfeifer you are right, I'm in marketing research, Lamia Al-Naama thank you for sharing these links.

Get a good understanding of your theory and review it through the literature to see how it's effective in practice and where it's limited in a particular field. With that information see how other relevant academic papers have been written to determine where that theory is at the current moment which will help you formulate the best research questions to ask.

Thank you Ravee Art Phoewhawm

@Kamila: Always welcome, good luck with your research

Thank you Ravee Art Phoewhawm , good luck too :)

For a strong theory-you MUST read books, for a rich information base-you MUST search available print/digital offline/online (preferably all) resources, for understanding and expression - you MUST think, assimilate, interprete and evaluate in a systematic and planned way.

It is a mere guideline, but the habit of doing this will definitely lead you to the coveted destination.

I think, you need research experience.

a lot of knowledge

a good methodology

thank you Taher Alkhalaf and Amit Baran Sharangi good luck for your research

Our present environment is not congenial & healthy & as such, any contribution in this line may certainly help readers to follow & practice for a guideline. Global environment & terrorist movement information & related contribution may certainly help guideline to the readers

This is my personal opinion

See the section: "2.4.8. Methods of writing scientific papers" in this work:

Preprint MODERN INFORMATION and COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES IN SCIENTI...

thank you Eugene Veniaminovich Lutsenko

To write a strong and valuable theoretical contribution you have to READ(with seriousness and understand properly) a strong and valuable theoretical contribution of others

nice advice Mahavir Balmukund Varma many thanks

Theoretical contribution or theory building needs some basic questions like what, why, for whom and how. Here "WHAT" means what kind of theory you want to build? you need to study different kind of theories, "WHY" means why do u want to build a theory? its purpose is important. "FOR WHOM" means to whom you are going to build any theory? it means target beneficiary of the theories and lastly "HOW" means the methodology of theory building. One needs to set comprehensive methodology to build any theoretical contribution. Further it also required comprehensive knowledge of different types of research, background of the study area, comprehensive objectives; one has the knowledge of the subject (social science vs natural science) background etc.