Need reliable/suitable measurement scale to measure Pay, Human resource management practices, working environment, motivation, promotion, job satisfaction, and job performance.
I think there is no one scale to include pay, human resource management practices, working environment, motivation, promotion, job satisfaction, and job performance. In general you may refer to Google Scholar or any other database to find measures for each of those constructs.
you can search any of those fields in google scholar, find some articles about and then searching each scale to measure of the variables in part of articles' methodology.
Mohammad Ali Align business strategy and individual goals through social learning and collaboration Empower your workforce with holistic performance management and leadership development
I worked 25 years ago with scales on job satisfaction of employees -- although the 11-item instrument was reliable, the sincerity of answers was usually low and there was a strong halo effect between questions in the same scale.
Regarding human resource management practices, you can use the instruments in the appendix of the enclosed paper.
Dear Mohammad Ali it sounds like you (or any lead researcher of this project) have prepared a big research framework without really going through the relevant literature. Because, I believe if a study model is derived through a thorough literature review, a researcher won't need to ask measurement instruments for all the constructs :) I am sorry but normally we seek guidance from the community here regarding particular problems of research, rather than asking for everything prior going to literature. Best Regards.
When in the research articles, especially published in top journals, have you seen the last time the complete detailed questionnaires, interview guides etc? In my (long) experience, this was rather a norm in 1970s - beginning of 1990s, but now saving on space in journals and protecting IP it became quire rare. I am regularly pushing Chief Editors in the journals where I serve as a member of editorial board to make appendixes to my articles with really used questionnaires.
Still, RG is full of demands for providing REAL research instruments and I understand such claims -- you need to read dozens of article to find a sign of the real instruments used. In many cases you work like a paleontologist reconstructing from a few bones a "full skeleton". In addition, not all researchers around the world has a full access to full-texts of leading journals.
Respected Prof. Igor Gurkov I absolutely agree with what you said, however it is still possible, in at least management literature, to find many construct instruments which are not proprietary, such as Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ). Moreover, researchers can easily get any non-proprietary instruments by writing the authors or developers of the same. I absolutely agree with the fact that not all have access to the leading journals and therefore it is hard for them to grab relevant articles. Nevertheless, I found RG very helpful in this context whenever it was hard to get an article.
What is absolutely right in your comments on Muhammad Ali, is that RG is full of general requests to indicate references, structure of Ms.dissertation plans etc. that makes difficult to find really valuable questions and productive discussion. I developed for my students a guide and train them how to put very detailed questions on research gate interesting to other RG members. I have a specially developed set of materials for RG use (an instruction for student, a manual for a teacher on how to train students, the system of assessment of the quality of students'work on RG and the efficiency of the feedback) but everything is in Russian). If you wish, I can send it, you may use Google translator.