I'm researching the interaction between International Humanitarian Non-governmental Organizations (IHNGOs) and States in times of civil war, framing the interaction as tension between two norms sets--humanitarianism (moral) and state responsibility/sovereignty (political). The background context is one of crisis, for both the State--the fact of civil war, and for the IHNGO--humanitarian needs. Schmitt's concept of the 'sate of exception' is relevant and I would like to explore the concept of 'crisis' further.

More Andrew Cunningham's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions