There is still a lot of hype around MOOCs - Massive Open Online Courses. I would like to find a good critical evaluation of them, based on solid empirical research. Can anyone help?
High quality empirical research on MOOCs is hard to find, but this is to be expected in a new field still finding its feet. Here are some starting points for you.
Various journals have published special issues on MOOCs - for example JOLT 9(2) and IRRODL 15(5) and more are forthcoming (e.g. BJET 46(3)).
(edit - added later) The IRRODL special issue drew together research reports form the MOOC Research Initiative http://www.moocresearch.com/reports
The recent LAK15 conference (http://lak15.solaresearch.org/home) had a strong focus on MOOC research, with papers available at http://dl.acm.org.gcu.idm.oclc.org/citation.cfm?id=2723576
My colleague Anoush Margaryan has published an analysis of the instructional quality of a range of (76) MOOCs:
Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Computers and Education, 80, 77-83.
Similarly, Toven-Lindsay and colleagues evaluated the tools/design of a range of (24) MOOCs against a pedagogical framework along dimensions of individual-group and objectivist-constructivist approaches.
Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 1-12.
Last June I heard a really interesting presentation by Erik Borg from Coventry University on this subject. His personal experience was very different from the hype about MOOCs.