You relate to a two different aspects

-sub. of revised mamuscript (revision requested)

-re-sub of rejected manuscript

What is the question?

Regards

GB

sub. of revised mamuscript Grzegorz Boczkaj

It should takr maximum same time as first sub. After approx 1 month you can send a qeustion to the handling editor.

Regards

GB

Thanks Grzegorz Boczkaj

Dear Getachew

When the referees wrote in their review the necessity for major revisions, such as a change in which variables should be used and/or a switch to a different statistical technique, and recommended rejection of the manuscript to the editor. The editor then chose not to follow the reject recommendation. As these referees are negatively biased in their opinion towards the paper the editor needs to switch the referees and compose a letter to the author(s) suggesting what they would need to do if they choose to resubmit and inform them that their if the paper is sent back it will be treated as a new submission, starting the review process as a fresh first-time submission. This will begin the clock again and take a comparable amount of time like all new submissions.

Dear Sir,

That is a convincing viewpoint. Thank you

Best regards, Raymond A K Cox

Following

When the manuscript re-submission and be processes, it is dealt with as new submission and will take long time for feedback . It is reviewed and then take a decision.

Thank you

Your reviewer is probably on record in which ever publishing system you used last time and wherever you submit, the editor has the option to use those review records. However, if you have been returned the manuscript after the evaluation any time you submit it it will be treated as a new manuscript. You probably need to make sure if the other reviews were objective and make the necessary changes in your manuscript before trying again.

Thank you Amit Mittal

Acknowledged, Thank you Amit Mittal