Should the reviewers be declared after the acceptance of an article for publication? Would that not make the review process better, more cooperative and more genuine?
How can the process become genuine once it is already completed? Even if they declare the reviewers after acceptance, it is not going to make any difference. Yes it is only going to let you know who has done the review of your paper and you would come to know about some experts in your field. If you can benefit yourself from this information, its up to you then.