My textbook is about social-science interviewing - and nothing to do with Archaeology.
(And I dont know what the overall population of items numbers are, in terms of which I've got more than 99%).
Perhaps there's 400 items overall in Qualitative Social research, and only 002 in Archaeology?
The professionalism of the ResearchGate statistics as researched and as presented is not completely convincing.
Can be because of how the underlying metrics are classifying the information or representing it in the calculation
Wow, congrats, on the high rating for your textbook in Qualitative Social Research: hoover, the score in Archaeology may be influenced by factors such as the specific content, target audience, or the evolving landscape of archaeological reteach. understanding the reasons behind the score in Archaeology could involve examining reviews, considering changes in the field, or seeking feedback form readers and experts in that domain.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Psychology