Hi.

My question is about 2-way ANOVA (and Freidmans test). I've no problem with the test per se but rather with the dataset in relation to the test(s).

My problem is that I've 16 different treatments and I would like to know if I can justify splitting my up dataset into smaller fractions or if I should stick to analyzing the whole dataset as it is..

The treatments I've are:

* Control

* Compound A at concentration 1, 2 and 3

* Compound B at concentration 4, 5 and 6

* Binary mixtures of compound A and B at every possible combination (e.g. A1+B4, A2+B4, A3+B4, A1+B5, etc).

Furthermore, I am investigating 8 different outcomes/endpoints.

I've already performed the 2-WA on the whole dataset, either by (1) comparing every treatment to one specific outcome or (2) by comparing smaller fractions the dataset to one specific outcome: e.g. control, A2, B5 and A2+B5; control, A2, B6 and A2+B6; and so forth.

I consider that both approaches can be justified but the latter approach increases both resoluation and the risk of type 1 errors.

How should I do and why? Should I stick with

(1) the whole datset?

(2) split up the dataset?

Best of regards // Andreas Eriksson, PhD student at the Univeristy of Jyväskylä, Finland.

More Andreas Nils Mauritz Eriksson's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions