You need to clearly define the structure undergoing displacement and the forces/loads and support conditions.

Dear Charles Chinwuba Ike thank you for replying. I'm not a civil engineer to answer all that you asked me right now. I just did experiments and I measured them. I have my own theory on earthquake design. All this is under investigation.

Theory

By controlling the displacement of the structure, you also control the tensions ... responsible for the inelastic deformations of the structure

With the method of designing, clamping the top-level nodes with the ground, I hope to divert the lateral inertial stresses of the earthquake into more powerful areas of the structure than those currently driven. These strong areas have the ability to absorb these tensions (preventing and relieving the relative displacements (ie drifts) and thus the tension that develops throughout the vector is limited) and returning them to the soil from where they came by subtracting in this way, great tensions and failures over the load-bearing structure of the building while ensuring a stronger bearing capacity of the foundation soil. Tensioning between of the upper edge of the walls with the earth reduces the displacements responsible for all the stresses that develop on the structural carrier. The patent is stacked into the ground to draw from it a force that transfers it to the upper end of the wall in order to apply a counterbalance to the torque of the wall

Τhe patent achieves the following

1)The consolidation of the nodes of highest level of the walls with the ground, using the mechanism of the invention, deflects the upward tensions created by the wall overturning torque transporting them freely and directly from the roof into the ground and in this way stops the displacements responsible for all growing tensions on the body of the bearing elements which they cause inelastic bending deformations and failures in a major earthquake. 2 ) Also the mechanism and method of anchoring provides very strong foundation in soft soils 3)The wall receives only compressive stresses at both ends a) at the upper end b) and the facing lower end near the base. Does not exist anymore tensile strength. This means that there are no longer torques in the nodes Does not exist anymore mechanism of concentric forces failure The floor mechanism (soft floor) does not exist anymore 4) Does not exist anymore coordination because the whole construction is shifted with the same frequency and the same oscillation amplitude 5) The wall also receives horizontal shear forces. Apply tension at all edges of the wall with the patent mechanism increases the ability to horizontal shear forces.

My own experiment. The model in this experiment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoM5pEy7n9Q&t=14s From 2.45 minutes to 2.50 minutes, that is, within 5 seconds, made 20 journeys of 25 cm ... so in 20 seconds made 80 journeys with 25 cm of oscillation width. These oscillations from one end to the other measure, and their respective time in sec. Frequency (Hz) is the fraction: v = number of such paths / corresponding time. 80/20 = 4Hz ...9.81 is the acceleration of the earth and we divide it with the acceleration we found to find the g. That is, how many times the acceleration is accelerated by a body that falls on the earth. In a natural earthquake I did this experiment with a 0.25 cm oscillating amplitude and a frequency of 4 Hz we have an acceleration ... a = (- (2 * π * 4) ^ 2 * 0.22) / 9.81 3,14x2 = 6,28x4 = 25,12X25,12 = 631,0144X0,22 = 157,754 / 9,81 = 16 g acceleration

The specimen in the experiment had a general mass weighing 880 kg. The second floor because of the inverted beam it carries is more pounds than half so I would say it is about 450kg and the ground floor is 430kg So to find the inertia force F first on the ground floor we say ... F = m.a 430 Χ 157,754 = 67834,22 Newton or 68 kN. and the first floor 450 Χ 157,754 = 70989 Newton or 71 kN. Total force F (Inertia) 68 + 71 = 139 kN Moment of inertia Strength X Height ^ 2 Ground floor 68Χ0,67Χ0,67= 30,53 kN First floor 71Χ1,35Χ1,35 = 129,4 kN Total Inertia Torque 30,53+129,4 = 160 kN

I did my own (comparable) experiments. These experiments speak for themselves about my theory. With the patent https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoM5pEy7n9Q Without the patent. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-X4tF9C7SE&t=77s Video of the patent https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zhkUlxC6IK4 Video of the patent, with, English speaking https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO6MxxH0lMU

Construction of the experimental specimen https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9_-OjhQdhsQ

First experiment https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6og4VWFcGA

One of the major design errors, towards the dynamic response of structures to seismic shifts.

The cooperation between concrete and steel in a Reinforced Concrete structure is achieved with relevance.

By the term - Relevance - is defined the combined action of the mechanisms that prevent the relative sliding between the bars of the reinforcement and the concrete surrounding it.

The mechanisms of relevance is adhesion, friction, and, in the case of steel bars with ribs cartilage , the resistance of the concrete trapped between the ribs cartilage.

The combined action of these mechanisms is considered to be equivalent to the development of shear stresses on the concrete and steel contact surface.

When these stresses reach their limit value, occurs destruction of relevance in the form of rupturing the concrete along the bars and detachment of the steel rods. The relevance mechanism on Concrete Walls, during rotation of the wall, multiplies the torque intensities at the base and transfers them to the foot girder which bends and breaks

SOLUTION

Connect the base to the periphery, with the earth, with the mechanisms of the patent

This connection of the base with the earth it transfers the torque power into the earth by preventing the transfer on the beam

If the union - i consolidation is made at both ends between the upper edges of the wall and the ground then we stop many other destructive tensions such as these are created from....

a) The bend of the wall, (b) the critical failure area, (the critical failure area does not appear with this method ) (c) the potential difference of the relevance mechanism observed in the body of the wall near the base there in the critical fault area between left and right torque. d) The connection of the upper edges of the wall with the ground beneath the foundation deflects the upward wall tensions (created by torque, roll over the wall) into the ground by removing large stresses from the structure.

The control of the displacements - deformations (as shown in the figure) is 100% connected with the structural damage control, because by controlling the displacements - deformations of the construction is prevented the occurrence of the damage