Great answer...

thank you doctor António José Rodrigues Rebelo

I mean the coming generations and what modern technology offers them in terms of providing all the requirements, calculations, design, processing, and all sciences...etc.

If we have a more detailed study about artificial intelligence, this technology has existed for a long time in other forms, and its basis is data and information given by humans with computer programs. Artificial intelligence can create based on what is given to it, but the human brain contains infinite information and is creating new codes every moment. Predicting the human brain and simulating it, like artificial intelligence, requires a lot of data that not only exists but is also created and completed and sometimes violated. Creativity is a process in which logic and information may be completely violated, combined and sometimes changed, and it can be said that the human brain is a supercomputer without code. Therefore, it cannot be said that artificial intelligence will be able to replace 100% creativity.

Thanks Mahdiyeh Afshar Bakeshloo ....

As I understand it, (poorly!) the utterances produced by AI software are produced, in part, by a stochastic process applied to massive samples of human text. To put it crudely, words are produced as a function of their probability of following other words in long strings of text. This creates an illusion of the kind of awareness to which terms like 'intuition' and 'creativity' might be applied.

(Shannon did this as early as 1948, and there's a nice example of the procedures he followed at https://plus.maths.org/content/good-looking-gibberish)

I call it an illusion since the material generated may sound plausible but is often factually incorrect. Check for yourself: ask Bard if it knows whether George Kelly (originator of Personal Construct Theory) and Karl Weick (originator of Sensemaking Theory) were aware of each other's work. The answer gives references in which they cited each other and this is plainly wrong– easily established by checking the references for yourself.

I did the same with ChatGPT, got the same nonsense... corrected ChatGPT... and now, ChatGPT informs you, correctly, that they weren't.

(Try for yourself: I haven't corrected Bard. Or generate a different factual query for yourself before someone else inputs a correction!)

AI software is dependent entirely on the corpus of pre-existing human text in its databases; it can add to it it when provided with corrections in the form of new material, but it doesn't actively interact with the external world to add to this corpus for itself. (To be able to do so would require a superordinate model of its own processing for managing that activity, but that's another story and this answer of mine is already long enough...)

It seems that this kind of external experience is necessary to acquire the kind of material of which terms like 'creativity' and 'intuition' can be applied and which Rebelo's answer so elegantly exemplified.

The appearance of Artificial Intelligence is the same natural event as the appearance of the Carbohydrate Form of Life on planet Earth.

All matter in the universe strives for a state of rest and immutability. Dead matter achieves this by cooling below the crystallization point. The carbohydrate form of Life uses genetic information to fix the structure in a colloidal solution that has not yet cooled down to the crystallization point of liquid-water. The silicon-electron life form appeared as a result of the Evolution of CarbonWater life form and has advantages over carbohydrate, since its substrate is an already cooled crystal structure. What gives the silicon-electron form of life is advantageous in the speed of information exchange and overall stability over time.

Our Life gradually translates into a form of information stability everything that the Creator Man touches. (It should be borne in mind that not every homo-sapiens has evolved up to the Creator's Man)

Artificial Intelligence in the Silicon-Electronic Form of Life - performs the same functions as Psyche and Thinking in the Carbohydrate Form of Life.

Both forms of information processing serve to increase stability in time: carbohydrate life forms strive for immortality and immortal reproduction, silicon electronic form to increasingly structuring the main chemical element of the earth's crust - silicon.

And finally, we got to a direct answer to the question posed: Artificial Intelligence will certainly replace the intuition of those homo-sapiens who are trying to resist the Evolution of the Universe. All homo-sapiens who do not understand the essence of the Evolution of the Universe use false intuition and as thousands of other extinct species of Carbohydrate life are doomed to extinction.

No one and nothing can for a long time resist this gigantic power of the Evolution of the Universe - the Desire for Stability, Harmony and Immutability!

Well, yes, the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics states that entropy always increases in a system closed to energy, so I'll go along with your notion of 'desire for stability'. Whether this is 'Harmony' is a moot point! But it's not 'Immutable' if the system is open to energy.

If we're into teleological accounts of evolutionary processes, there's an alternative approach to your own: Teilhard de Chardin's notion of orthogenesis, which focuses on a final 'unification' rather than entropic 'stability'. Perhaps that's how your 'Harmony' is achieved...

(What a refreshing discussion!)

Devi Jankowicz Your reaction includes 2 objections:

1 Using 2d TD law, you are absolutely right that there is a place to increase the internal entropy of the system, because the living unit takes energy from the outside world all the time. And right in the fight against the growth of entropy, Evolution has developed:

1.1 cell membrane, which limits the entry of chaos into the body

1.2 The method of continuing life by changing generations.

Devi Jankowicz Little bit more about harmonization;-) It is easy to experimental proof about harmonisation every chaotical process. I don't know if somebody already did it. Everybody can do it now, because is important.

And so very usefull could be idea: The Harmonization of every chaotic processes suggests that for the overall entropy of the system, the entropy of frequencies of the harmonic series (Gaussian distribution in the Fourier series) is equal to the entropy of field disturbances (for example, for sound - air pressure)

A demonstration of this thesis can be considered the birth of the First Law of Semiotics, which states that we create words - as a memory address where the memory of slightly changing events is stored - harmonization is precisely one of the phenomena that weakly changes over time, for the sake of which people invented, and I'm happy to use the word "Harmony" as an addres of my brain where a lot of very good things are stored

Alexander Eist: I don't know enough to follow your point about harmonic series and Gaussian distributions... but I'm reminded of the phenomenon of the spontaneous synchronisation observable in a group of metronomes. Would that be an example of your harmonisation of the elements of an initially chaotic system, I wonder.

yes, that would. We observe the process of harmonization everywhere where time flows. It can be seen in the synchronization of many chaotic vibrators: such as metronomes in the macro world, atoms in the crystal of the micro world so turning star clusters into harmonious gallactics with periodic elementswithin themselves in the giant world. The same processes we can see in the social system if observe enough long time. For example, mass commodity production, mass school or university education,... and many such processes reflect the process of harmonizing of the system = spreading unique technological information generated at one point in the universe at one point in time. So we can consider auto-harmonization like the fundamental law of nature.

António José Rodrigues Rebelo

To accept this point of view, it is necessary

1 at the moment temporary to narrow the denotate of the words "creation of the information" to the level of... this: Information is a time-independent property of some matherial object called "memory," encoded in some language.

and

2 meaning of the "valuated" to take the point of view by the Univerce Evolution.

The law of Semiotics do not disable of the returning back the old usually meaning of the words "information" and "valuated" after.

Dear Doctor

"While AI has come a long way in recent years, it still has several limitations that prevent it from fully replacing human creativity. One major limitation is that AI can only work with previous data and patterns. It can't come up with completely new ideas or concepts on its own. This means that AI is great at tasks that involve repetitive and predictable patterns, like data analysis and image recognition. However, it struggles when faced with creative and unpredictable situations.

Another limitation of AI is that it lacks emotion and empathy. It can't replicate human emotions or understand the emotional impact of art or music. As a result, AI-generated content may lack the emotional depth and impact that comes from human creativity.

Additionally, AI is only as smart as the data it's fed. If the data is biased or limited, then AI will also be biased and limited in its creativity. AI also struggles with certain types of creativity, such as humor or sarcasm, which are heavily dependent on context and culture.

Finally, AI requires specific parameters to operate, which means that it can't handle ambiguity and uncertainty as well as humans can. It can't make intuitive leaps or think outside the box without being explicitly programmed to do so.

Overall, AI has several limitations that prevent it from completely replacing human creativity. While it excels at certain tasks, it can't replicate the emotional depth, intuition, and unpredictability of human creativity."

Machine learning cannot completely replace human intuition and creativity; it can, however, be simulated. For further details, please refer to my three articles:

@ Nidhal Kamel Taha El-Obari

Some people may doubt the absolute unattainability of human abilities by artificial mechanisms, machines, devices.

And it is right they, who creates all devices with a sensitivity by billions times higher and more precission than the human senses and feelling.

Right they doubted individuals also creates computer machines that are billions times faster than a human whet they reads a text and right they solves the human inaccessible mathematical problems.

But of course you can always find something in a human doing, that is not yet automated at the moment... But the story is not over yet... isn't so?

The answer is yes definitely, just the time is not known. I think it will happen a few years later. https://www.researchgate.net/post/The_age_of_banality_is_beginning_Is_there_any_hope_for_creativity_and_originality_in_the_generative_AI_era