I think that artificial Intelligence can never replace human intuition and creativity. It suffices do say that it is due to human intuition and creativity that we have AI, not the other way around. More to the point, AI often sends human intuition and creativity on holiday and dispense a lot of people with thinking.
I am Dr. Khanmohammadi
In my opinion, deep knowledge and hermeneutic interpretation should be used in intuition, which requires experience and diagnosis, and the main part explains the result based on feeling and interpretation.
With the help of artificial intelligence, this is not possible because the main thinking and structure of artificial intelligence is based on data mining and algorithms and does not have feelings, and it comes to a conclusion based on the paradigm of the positio system, and in fact there will be no trace of feelings in it.
Of course, with the use of artificial intelligence, it becomes possible to categorize and issue statements more accurately, but for witnesses, the final statement must be issued by the researcher.
As a result, it should be said that the origin of intuition is based on hermeneutic interpretation and paradigm, which cannot be implemented with artificial intelligence and must be human-centered.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Immunology
- Antibodies