Dear Eduard, the question is interesting, but my answer will be not so optimistic. Even if we will develop jointly such a strategy on RG, who will know about it? The fraction of all scientists among all people is tiny to create public opinion. Will policy makers listen to us? Will people with money follow our advises to make the world safer if it will cost them a lot? It depends on the level of their altruism.

The compass of this query is very broad but its underlying theme seems to relate to the role of science in sustainable development and poverty reduction. From this optic, Presentation Challenge: Science, Technology, and Innovation and the Tripl...

the Arts, poems,science fields,and all life science can not privent wara, due to the critical thinking of a man,peoples are crowded of wealth, some of them poverty,some rich ,both of them not satisfied,countries as peoples. no one of them follow his benefits, not collaborate to make a peace in earth ,Good create the life on earth that wars and peace ,you can choose the best . Good create our minds and let us to choose what is suitable .

We have skipped addressing critical global problems such as global poverty. Although the world is doing better in the last two decades, poverty persists in parts of the world. Poverty means lack of education, lack of health, lack of access to technology and more. All lead to unevenness and problems in the realm of peace and human welfare.

Indeed, the Human Nature is quite complex and the world wealth is not accessible to everyone.

The oldest sickness recorded in human history. Peace, prosperity, etc can only be achieved if every one respect , love and care for each other.

Andre Malraux said that "the 21st century will be religious or not at all." In fact, he expressed the need for recourse not to dogma, but to morality, to principles, to the morality of the city, the state, the cradle of culture and civilization of mankind over the millennia. This is the revival of the state. "The state may be eclipsed, broken, but it must always be reconstituted and reconstituted without fail, as if it were a biological necessity of society" (Braudel F.). Since the state-economy-society relationship exists today, it has a past, but the most important is its future from the perspective of humanizing the development of human society, of building a sustainable society centered on the good of man and not on profit, everyone's effort will have to be directed towards optimizing this relationship, otherwise the 21st century will not be at all. Cornel Ionescu, Revision of the State, (2001), pg. 258. Economica Publishing House, Bucharest.

Dear all,

The sound ground for societies building is called morality that’s a genetically defined feature of the most modern humans.

“Marc Bekoff and Jessica Pierce… have argued that morality is a suite of behavioral capacities likely shared by all mammals living in complex social groups (e.g., wolves, coyotes, elephants, dolphins, rats, chimpanzees). They define morality as "a suite of interrelated other-regarding behaviors that cultivate and regulate complex interactions within social groups." This suite of behaviors includes empathy, reciprocity, altruism, cooperation, and a sense of fairness…This supports the notion that moral reasoning is related to both seeing things from other persons points of view and to grasping others feelings…Cognitive neuro-scientist Jean Decety thinks that the ability to recognize and vicariously experience what another individual is undergoing was a key step forward in the evolution of social behavior, and ultimately, morality. The inability to feel empathy is one of the defining characteristics of psychopathy, and this would appear to lend support to Decety's view…” (Morality - Wikipedia)

Interestingly,

The idea that human civilization is based on competition and violence inside human society is propagated by immoral leaders to justify their immorality. The societies led by such leaders become stupid and destructive, as we observe from cases of tyranny of different kinds even masking themselves as moral superiority.

“During World War II, research conducted by US Army Brigadier General S.L.A. Marshall found that, on average, only 15% to 20% of American riflemen in WWII combat fired at the enemy. In Civil War Collector s Encyclopedia, F.A. Lord notes that…most military personnel resist firing their weapons in combat, that – as some theorists argue – human beings have an inherent resistance to killing their fellow human beings. Swank and Marchand s WWII study found that after sixty days of continuous combat, 98% of all surviving military personnel will become psychiatric casualties… Maurice Walsh…argues that the general populace is more neutral towards war and that wars only occur when leaders with a psychologically abnormal disregard for human life are placed into power…(Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany…But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship... All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country… Hermann G ring at the Nuremberg trials, April 18, 1946).” (War - Wikipedia)

The study shows that immorality is defined genetically in a very low number of people, probably not more than two percents. But these people occupy high positions in human society due to lack of internal bans on inhuman behaviour. They are doing what modern people never do to get power and privileges. The people often believe and vote for them because they are looking attractive, energetic and promising, especially distantly and on TV.

“The dark triad is a subject in psychology that focuses on three personality traits: narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Use of the term “dark” implies that people possessing these traits have malevolent qualities… People scoring high on these traits are more likely to commit crimes, cause social distress and create severe problems for an organization, especially if they are in a leadership position… Narcissism is characterized by grandiosity, pride, egotism, and a lack of empathy…Machiavellianism is characterized by manipulation and exploitation of others, a cynical disregard for morality, and a focus on self-interest and deception…Psychopathy is characterized by enduring antisocial behavior, impulsivity, selfishness, callousness, and remorselessness… All three traits of the dark triad have been found to have substantial genetic components… Compared to biological factors, the influence of environmental factors seem to be more subtle and account for less…Machiavellianism is the most likely dark triad trait to be influenced by experience… it has been found that individuals demonstrating dark triad personality can be highly successful in society. However, this success is typically short-lived… research indicates correlations with aggression, racism, and bullying among other forms of social aversiveness…In the general population, the prevalence rates for sub-clinical and clinical psychopathy are estimated at around 1% and 0.2%, respectively… study psychopathy…using self-reported instruments, as with the Levenson Primary and Secondary Psychopathy Scales, The Psychopathic Personality Inventory, and the Self-Report Psychopathy Scale…Similarly, assessment of narcissism required clinical interviews, until the popular "Narcissistic Personality Inventory" was created by Raskin and Hall in 1979… The original published version of the Mach-IV is still the most widely used in empirical research… all three traits share characteristics such as a lack of empathy, interpersonal hostility, and interpersonal offensiveness… a number of measures have recently been developed that attempt to measure all three dark triad traits simultaneously, such as the Dirty Dozen and the short dark triad (SD3)…numerous studies have shown that men tend to score higher than women on narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy… Trzesniewski & Donnellan (2010)…argue that there have not been large changes in disposition or behavioral strategies across generations…Jonason and colleagues (2012) found that each of the dark triad traits was related to manipulation in the workplace, but each via unique mechanisms. Specifically, Machiavellianism was related with the use of excessive charm in manipulation, narcissism was related with the use of physical appearance, and psychopathy was related with physical threats…The dark triad traits have also been found to be fairly well-represented in upper-level management and CEOs…” (Dark triad - Wikipedia)

It is not surprising that leaders of this kind cannot be suitable leaders for human communities. And society could not be wiser than its leaders. It looks that fate of humanity depends on how this problem finds a solution.

Best regards,

Konstantin M. Golubev

No.