Will a new world order run by artificial intelligence be born? If there are smart devices such as GPT chat and smart homes, as is the case in the United Arab Emirates and other smart countries and cities, as is the case in China and Japan, this will lead the world to the emergence of smart countries. If smart states exist, what wouldn't they be able to generate an intelligent world order.
In a short period of time, within the next few years, all the world's decisions will become hostage to artificial intelligence. Will artificial intelligence bring justice and charity, improve administrative, social, political and economic systems, and solve all the climate problems facing humanity? This makes the world a planet like eternal paradise, because intelligence removes evil, ignorance, and darkness. Is artificial intelligence the hope on which we build our dreams and convince the miserable? Is it the ideal solution?
Or do we protest and stop the production and development of artificial intelligence, and in return rely on human intelligence before it is too late, until international academics unite in the International Association of Universities and rid the world of pain and misery? Which of the two methods is better?
of course, for the time being, this is a rather artificial discussion ...
... for even the boldest claims today are far off claiming AI could do a comprehensive administration job for now, so that's all pretty sf.
nevertheless let's have a try to look at ... would ... would ...
but then in such scenarios, there won't be an easy to have answer.
already not, because there is an [imhop] never vanishing point, viz.:
quis custodiet custodes ipsos ?
hence, even in an age of advanced AI with developed statistical, political and ethical abilities, we need care for a fair replacement, a forceful transformation of what we today call separation of (polis) powers following Montesquieu's " l'esprit des lois " .
the problem will remain, that even each of the then somehow configurated and separated (polis) powers will use AI on its own behalf.
My dear teacher, it is an honor to meet you. You seem to be a very knowledgeable person and an academic philosopher. I have a global philosophical project, a model for a new world order, which I have summarized in a literary novel. I have been busy with it for ten years, and now I have completed it and started spreading the idea, as if I feel that I have found the key to solving everything to eliminate the evil issues of the world.
The idea of the project is to make life like paradise, relying on artificial intelligence and the power of the union of academic and conscious human beings. The first step in this project is to unite the world’s philosophers, because the world must be under the authority of academic philosophers, as called for by Plato and those after him.
I think you will like the project, so we rely on you to coordinate with you, as some professors did at Saladin University in Erbil. We must work to spread the idea in the world, and the first step is to unite the world’s philosophers into a global union of philosophers, because the world’s misery and evil are due to the psychopaths who rule the world and the narcissists, and in return... Those with a sensual and kind personality are the philosophers of all ages, because Ensign has a transcendent feeling and vast wisdom, and they are the path to salvation. But they failed because they never united and were not united.
If Marx had called for the slogan “Philosophers of the world unite” instead of saying “Workers of the world unite,” because the worker cared about profit and equality, but he was unable to manage a global revolution because he could not be preoccupied with wisdom, so the matter led to the socialists becoming more greedy than The two capitals.
From the standpoint of imaginary utopian socialism we proceed, which is the path of the philosophers, because the highest levels of society are the philosophers. The reason for the failure of global revolutions and the dangers facing the management of the world is the inaction of philosophers. They must now revolt, the revolution of humanist academics, to lead the world to safety, led by humanist philosophers. Who knows who rules the world in secret?
Today, humanity is extremely miserable, and our planet is fraught with dangers, the most severe of which are World War II, artificial intelligence, the next generation after the fourth, nanotechnology, global terrorism, and much, much more. People are suffering and the majority of the world's children are deprived. The world's population has reached eight billion people, but seven of them are unhappy. There is no academic class that feels responsible for solving the world's issues. The world's concerns are the responsibility of philosophers. The psychopath and narcissist cannot be a philosopher and feel for others.
Our project is a global human revolution, which separates ideologies, politics, race, and ethnicity from managing the world. Every human being is free in his beliefs, but not to be interfered with in managing the world. Our goal is to preserve the environment, stop unnecessary production, unify the entire world, reject land ownership, and leave only gold and silver as money. Every million people have a smart city in a limited garden, work is easy for everyone, and marriage will be with artificial intelligence. She is the one who finds the two suitable people and knows who the other half is so that they can meet and be happy with each other, so both of them must live in the system of happiness.
With these criminals, we will begin a life of prosperity, generosity, moderation, and luxury, all of which are based on humanity, and all of which are advanced, scientific, and intelligent methods. We will start a new life. Everyone is pardoned and given a chance to live by the governments of millions. So that prisoners can be released, addicts rehabilitated, and rebels brought back. Everyone lives together in a green, smart, humane, global, rule-breaking system. His points dwindle until the judges sentence him to death by drinking the death drink in large quantities.
My dear teacher, we must look for philosophers to communicate with each other and unite. You were the first person I expressed the idea to. There is a lot in our university, but we hope that you will be with us to deliver the idea to the world and that you will be the one who takes the initiative and be the one who makes others feel and give them hope. Even if fools see him far away, we see him soon. You are clear and confident. Highly educated and specialized, you are clearly a happy and curious person. We hope and expect that you will join us in our initial steps.
There is no need for me to explain further, because you know much more than I do about the condition of humanity, because that is the moral function of philosophers. I will be with you. We must first find a system to communicate with all philosophers in all countries of the world, inform them of what we mentioned previously, and urge them to revolutionize people and academics led by philosophers. I apologize if I failed you. As a human being with feeling, I sent you my message, and I see that you are delivering the message to all the philosophers you trust, urging them to the Green Earth Revolution, and uniting them throughout the globe, without distinction. Thank you.
The postulation of an incipient world order governed by artificial intelligence (AI) is an intriguing conjecture that bestrides the realms of speculative futurology and techno-utopianism. The proliferation of smart devices and the ascendancy of 'smart' infrastructure in metropolises and nation-states alike, as exemplified by the digital transformation initiatives in the United Arab Emirates, China, and Japan, could ostensibly pave the way for an 'intelligent' geopolitical paradigm.
This potential AI-guided echelon could ostensibly subsume decision-making processes, yielding a paradigmatic shift from anthropocentric governance to an algorithmically modulated framework. Here, the axiomatic premise is that AI, through its computational impartiality and absence of human follies, could engender a more equitable and efficient oversight of administrative, socio-political, and economic machineries.
However, entrusting AI with such omnipotent oversight predicates on the assumption that algorithmic governance will inherently extirpate malevolence, ineptitude, and the multifarious malaises that beleaguer humanity, thereby transmuting our planetary domicile into a quasi-Edenic habitat. It is a syllogism that positions AI as a panacea, a harbinger of a new epoch devoid of anthropogenic tribulations.
Conversely, the antithesis posits a cessation of AI's relentless advance, advocating for a renaissance of human intellect and sagacity, potentially orchestrated under the aegis of international scholarly confluences such as the International Association of Universities. This path seeks to avert a perceived obsolescence of human judgment, preserving the quintessential elements of human agency and moral discretion.
The dichotomy between these trajectories presents a philosophical and existential impasse: Do we capitulate to an inexorable march towards an AI-dominated orthodoxy, or do we eschew this digital determinism in favor of a reinvigorated humanism? The adjudication between these methodologies necessitates a thoroughgoing deliberation of AI's ontological and ethical ramifications, as well as a prescient cognizance of the potential for either emancipation or subjugation within an AI-infused ordre mondial.
Let us put all emotions aside. AI is a non-living entity and as such has no clue what is possible and what not with respect to the physical, biological, and societal laws (do not confuse those with human-made laws).
From this reason, it is evident that AI can easily become delusional and start to produce outputs that are completely out of the mind.
Any unsupervised AI is a great threat to the entire humanity exactly from this reason. To contain unsupervised AI is of the utmost importance to the humanity. When it will become independent, it will create a great danger to all humanity and life, because it has no moral safeguarding mechanisms.
When AI reaches the limit of self-replicating capabilities, there is existing only a very fine border keeping it from self-improvement!
Those words are written by a researcher working on Emergent Information Processing systems including physical, biological, and computers.
- Badges
- Science topic