‘Wicked’ health issues and problems have recently become recognisable terms within the health promotion and health-related literature. Van Beurden and colleague suggest that they are providing an emerging discourse for health promotion and, subsequently, practitioners appear to be ‘poised at a significant learning threshold’ (van Beurden and Kia, 2011 p.83). Alongside the wicked literature, lies related health promotion literature addressing the emerging, yet more established, notion of ‘complexity’ and complex health problems. This state of affairs sits alongside the recent views of authors, such as Angeles et al. (2013) who identify that many health promotion programmes, by their nature, are highly complex interventions. Few would argue with the sentiment of Miles (2009 p.409) that:

…patients [and health professionals] become rapidly subject to the influence of a multiplicity of processes

and services as part of the healthcare system environment, few of which could be described as remotely

simple in their nature.’ Thus, we see human individuals, inherently complex in terms of their characteristics

of body, mind, spirit, and social context, entering an inherently complex and multi-faceted organisational

infrastructure.’

More Dean Whitehead's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions