Maxwell says that electric and magnetic fields are correlated with each other. Einstein hopes to unite these two together. I see people use special relativity to explain the magnetic field from moving charges.
But how about we assume that there is no electric field only magnetic field in the entire universe? Photons are tiny magnets that have north and south poles absorbing and emitting photons with lower frequencies/energies.
Matters are curled-up photons whose magnetic poles are rotating with each other forming chiral structures and producing chiral radiative vibrational fields that emit all directions. Some structures are positive and others are negative, or neutral if two photons rotate with each other. This can explain the mass and inertia. Moving faster across space at the same time increases the rotational frequency and thus needs energy. Appling energy to matter distributes it in both kinetic and rotational freedom thus it gains mass and inertia. Mass is a consequence of energy conservation and inertia is a consequence of momentum conservation.
Jixin Chen I feel more comfortable with the idea that all magnetism is caused by moving electric charge. Then all we have to do is explain the cause of electric charge.
In the Space Time Wave theory, the proton, neutron and electron are looped waves in the medium of space. Electric charge arises due to a time variation associated with the space wave variation which results in a net compression or expansion of space.
See presentation:
https://youtu.be/zEu-_0ACl3I
I think if you wanted to explain everything in terms of magnetism you would need to explain the cause of magnetism.
Richard
I think we can use Richard Feynman’s idea to assume that the magnetic is absorption of photons in one end and emission of photons in the other. This does not add complexity because curled up photon is a motor that stirring the space and time using its angular momentum. It is way more easier for me to conceptualize the nature of charges. I used to think charges are constantly emitting photons but a monopole will deplete itself and does not make sense. Magnets are perfectly balanced which has no problem in explaining mass and inertia. That is we now don’t need complicated particles including Higgs. Mass is energy conservation and inertia is momentum conservation. The rotating photon is like a wheel dose not want to tilt it spinning axis.
This idea also explains the 1/r^2 dependence of charge interaction because the number of photons matter emits are fixed speed over time and uniform over the sphere. Gravity can be a Fourier transform of rotating magnets with wave of push and pull. Special relativity certainly holds because photon has fixed speed of light.
Jixin Chen
A different view, if electromagnetic waves are considered as the most fundamental energy-momentum entities, with inseparable electric and magnetic fields, all physical properties of particles, charge, magnetic moment, mass, and gravitational field, can be explained rationally.
Preprint Summary Table of Light String and Light Ring Properties, Supersymmetry
Best Regard, FAN
philosophically we speculate that the universe is constructed from one simple elementary structure with a ON state and a OFF state.This can be found everywhere in philosophy and partially demonstrated in virtual reality. In VR we can imagine that the ultimately completed world indistinguishable from real is for sure constructed from the On and Off state of a digit physically realized from a diode and nothing more. However we don’t know the building block of the universe. I have thought following the others that we need charges to make the photon and maters. However it is hard to imagine how charge is made and if charges are exchanging photons and other elementary particles, then what are those made? It is also hard to explain the magetism using charges. Because magnetic is as important as electric, maybe it is worthwhile to suspect it is the most fundamental building block. The advantage is it carriers N and S that naturally combines the need of On and Off.
That is the Maxwell equations might be lower estimating the magnetic field which might be the only thing that matters.
If all forces are conducted by photon, there will be no pushing force faster than speed of light near Earth. But since space is expanding much faster than the speed of light, we can create a real vacuum in the front of an space engine which can pull the materials faster than the speed of light, i.e, a bubble space with zero photon and a valve on the back and a photon pump motivating the investigation of the photon field interaction.
The wrapped-up photon model has a problem. Because we can push mass, meaning that mass must push the standing photon using photons. But we don’t know how photon-photon interactions work. Imagine we push an electron and the photon makes it spins faster and faster along its center which must come from untangling its spins at smaller dimensions. Let’s further guess the electron structure is a photon self-spinning and then spinning on a virtual center and its total velocity is the speed of light like the moon obit speed of light with respect to Earth and then Sun but both Earth and sun are not there and the moon is holding this motion by its own field. So if we push the moon, it distributes its spin into earth spin and sun translations. ( Is this the String theory? ) Still, this model is problematic approaching the speed of light when the moon will stop spinning and the earth will stop spinning only the sun moving speed of light thus time freezes. The interaction between particles is hard to imagine in this situation. Thus the whole model could be wrong given matters in the universe are moving fast.
Thus we can hypothesize that the energy, momentum and angular momentum of the universe or an isolated system are all conserved. The macroscopic momentum variation is off set by the microscopic momentum. For example the spinning object will have its atomic spin off set the net angular momentum. The same thing for electron orbiting whose angular momentum plus the core and electron angular momentum is conserved.
A new energy conservation idea has been proposed by Prof. Markolf H. Niemz at Heidelberg Universit, Germany:
Preprint Can Physics Benefit from a New Concept of Time?
The speed of light is postulated to all matter in this theory whose hidden part is placed in the 4th Euclidean dimension. In my opinion this is the curling dimension that is responsible for quantum wave mechanics.
The most exciting part of the theory is it redefines time to Euclidean relative time rather than Einstein’s observer’s time, the latter is susceptible to information speed limit, i.e., what one has observed is true but past information which may have no standing on its current status.
I suspect that mass will quit being fundamental properties, time and space regain places and energy gains as well.
I highly recommend to give it a read.
Jixin
Read more and found out that the concept that magnetic field is hypothesized as more fundamental than electric field is not new and has been pursued by many for over 50-70 years and many are related to the searching of magnetic monopole. I think there might be no monopole but always a dipole. I hope someone can summarize this field of research.
- Badges
- Science topic