@ in the CERN Standard Model there are 3 uper & 3 down Quarks as well as 3 neutrinos and 3 electrons; as they lay all 3 on the same charge level (2/3, -1/3, 0, -1), the Euclid Geometry postulates that they lay then on a Circle line, what means that the Standard Model comprises according to Dirac 7 Circle Planes, (1, 2/3, 1/3, 0, -1/3, -2/3, -1) . Why there exists only a very long Lagrange formula of quantum theory and no construction picture ( Gell-Mann left 2 constructions 1960 before the overrolling quantum theory) ?
Up to 1900s all we knew Mechanical Physics (MP) and then when Quantum discovered, again we thought and think it must work mechanically, and that why we called it Quantum Mechanics (QM), Here is the reality, QM does not exist, but Quantum Physics does. The different between these two is day & night, they have no relation at all.
CERN is following QM Not QP. When an atom can change thermodynamic into a motion by its electron, without friction, then we must accept an atom as whole. The Space of an atom become part of the atom, not just holder. CERN never has any respect for space of the atom. to understand an atom this article of mine is eyeopener.
https://www.academia.edu/44088541/Hydrogens_Journey_in_the_Quantum_Universe
regards.
Dear Hermann J. Scheuber
I have no answer to your question. Nevertheless, I have downloaded your visualizations of the particles of the Standard model (very interesting to see a geometrical representation).
As far as I am right, the particles of the Standard model represent geometrical differences of the structure of space itself. Unfortunately if a particle has a diameter smaller than 0,5 x 10-15 m it is no longer a particle like we know it in physics because of the asymptotic freedom (thus compositions of concentrations of energy). The properties of particles smaller than 0,5 x 10-15 m are not real but are reflected by the properties of vacuum space around these “particles”. Anyway, your geometrical representations are really interesting. Maybe I have to study your images to determine the topological deformations that are responsible for their theoretical creation in the Standard model.
With kind regards, Sydney
Thanks to Javad Fardaei for the answer that CERN had to do with the old QM and not with the newer QPysics, comprising specially the most Important particle, the Hydrogen. But I think, that the smaller Particles, the Quarks & Neutrinos should also could be seen together with the other particles (Proton, Neutron...) on one construction picture for everyman & not only for mathematics People.
Thanks to Sidney Ernest Grimm; if only the Dimension is the crítical, then I think we have also a Dimension, and we are looking and see all in picture geometrically. So I think Gell-Mann did very well & first our vision is more important than that what is ok. for the QM. Therefore also for QM everybody can assume that 3 Points lay on a Circle line with all other consequences, what seems better than laying all Particles on a heap without a picture for everyman exempt for mathematics superiors lyking the putting in
Dear Hermann, When I was reading Mr. Gell-Mann Nobel laurite "Quark and the jaguar" it give me the expression that we are faraway to understand an atom. I don't know how the pomegranate came to my mind as the presentation of hadrons complexity. The way he mentioned each quark must have multi-function that we do not know. Just sharing
Article Hydrogen's Journey in the Universe
regards
Dear Hermann J. Scheuber
I agree with you that reality is geometrical (dynamical structure). Unfortunately, most of the Standard model is constructed without the help of basic concepts about the geometry. That’s why we cannot find clear descriptions in physics about the nature of a particle, field, space, etc., etc.
Anyway, I will start to examine your papers because I am really impressed by your method to visualize the elementary particles of the Standard model.
With kind regards, Sydney
CERN perception of an atom is mechanics, this vision is incorrect. WHY?
ONE: CERN never study the Space of an atom, while space of an atom is functioning element and holding whole atom to itself, and it change as an atom get more electron. I.e. space of an iron is different from hydrogen. or it is changing the space of two gaseous of hydrogen & oxygen to liquid space.
TWO: CERN should quit quantum mechanics and emphasize on Quantum Physics, because these two are very different from each other. QM is dealing with breaking atom to pieces and smash them together. this action does not bring anything on the table, and we are the witness of it for two decades.
Quantum Physics is dealing with the whole atom, (hadrons, electron and space) and atom behavior, because none of the atom are the same. EVIDENCE?
we are the best example, we all are sharing 99.99% the same DNA but none of us the same, it is the same with snowflakes, popcorn, and non of the five ocean has the same color, and same as human or vegetations. Hydrogen has journey in our universe,
Article Hydrogen's Journey in the Universe
regards. .