Why do magnets attract or attract certain maiteaux, or repel each other, or roll over each other, in the first three cases the electrons of the two magnets tend to form a broglie wave thanks to the round trip (aller-retour) voltage of their lines of magnetic fields (see in my document), in the last, i.e. the fact that they roll over each other, is due to the fact that the lines of magnetic fields rotate in the same direction (configuration 1 in my document) and also the gravity which is below the magnetic field lines of the two magnets are also in configuration 1 see my document, because each stretch the space in opposite directions.
I have a different view of magnetism, which I do not know if it is useful to answer this question. I will state it with this, and if it is welcomed, we will continue it.
According to the model we presented, the magnetic element can be a pair of electrons in an atomic orbital. That is, two electrons with opposite spins at a certain distance from each other are a magnetic element.
For this reason we will not have magnetic unipolarity (magnetic monopole), there is also orientation. Orientation in a structure can cause rotation.
Dear Boubacar Moussa Abdou I am presenting unprecedented remark that put quantum mechanics obsolete, therefore Magnetism is a force that occur outside of an atom, or simply is not inside of an atom, so speak.
My question is, why electron? 1St the science never observed electron in the atom!
Atoms are smart to my understanding...&...Nothing is forking mechanics
Article Hydrogen's Journey in the Universe
regards
Boubacar Moussa Abdou Magnets attract and repel because of their intrinsic properties. The electrons within the atoms of magnets have rotation about their nucleus which is either clockwise or anticlockwise rotation due to which magnetic fields produced. Thus those materials which have clockwise rotation of electrons will produce same direction magnetic fields and will attract those materials in which electrons revolve clockwise and vice-versa. I hope you understand!!!!
Dear Shakeel Ahmed
Science up to this date never observed electron yet,
how do we know it is electron rotation?
Dear Javad Fardaei
For your kind information Science observed Electrons and neutrons also and accelerates them to perform atomic reactions.
Q:how do we know it is electron rotation?
Ans:The only thing rotates and revolves around the nucleus are electrons and due to rotational motion of electrons the magnetic fields are produced.
Dear Shakeel
I do have problem with whole atom that we know.
Again we do not see magnetic field in atom. Like an atom with 20 electrons, must create 20times more than hydrogen, but we do not see it that way, Or the same with electron that we never seen, but we think electron in the atom exist.
regards
Electrons actually exist, there are ten elementary particles (qaurk down, quark up, electron, gamma ray, neutrino) as well as the five anti of these particles and the higgs boson (and its anti) from which it all comes as a product. of successive subdivision (see in my doc). We must provide the effort to transcend the imagination that we have elementary particles like round pebbles. in reality they have the shape of a coin, and are breaths, which deform the space, consisting of an expansion and a contraction, and a proper rotation (the spin) which vary when they are in a Time. Time is the intensity of the force that causes the expansion and contraction of the breath here the elementary particle, the greater this force, the slower the Time, so the rotation of the elementary particle becomes slower, otherwise that is to say when this force is weak, the Time is fast because the phase of contaction and expansion is fast and the rotation is fast. this elementary facet of particles has consequences in the formation of the nucleus, on the magnetic field lines generated, as well as the electromagnetic waves and the gravity and the Time of the constituted atom ...
In French
Les électrons existent réellement, il existe dix particules élementaires (qaurk down, quark up, électron, rayon gamma, neutrino) ainsi que les cinq anti de ces particules et le boson de higgs (et son anti) duquel elle provient toutes en tant que produit de subdivision successive (voir dans mon doc). Il faut fournir l'effort de transcender l'imagination qu'on a des particules élementaire comme des cailloux ronde. en réalité elles ont la forme d'une piéce de monnaie, et sont des souffles, qui deforment l'espace, consistant en une expansion et une contraction, et une rotation propre (le spin) qui varient quand elles sont dans un Temps. Le Temps est l'intensité de la force qui provoque l'expansion et la contraction du souffle ici la particule élementaire, plus cette force est grande, plus le Temps est lent, donc la rotation de la particule élementaire devient lente, dans le cas contraire c'est à dire quand cettte force est faible, le Temps est rapide car la phase de contaction et expansion est rapide et la rotation est rapide. cette facette des particules élementaire a des conséquences dans la formation du noyau, sur les lignes de champ magnétqiues engendrées, ainsi que les ondes électromagnétiques et la gravité et le Temps de l'atome constitué ...
Dear Javad, here is an illustration (attched file) of an atom with have 4 elctrons.
the elctrons move around the atomic nucleus in the same direction
and 2 elctrons in quantum cell have the same Time (same speed), it's why the loops (boucle en français) of magnetic field are formed in each quantum cell and are localised in a specific side of the atom.
And in this side we have the gravity photon who get out. The orbit for each electron from the 2 electrons in a quantum celle, are in parallels plans. The problem to observ a electron in atom is not possible, because the elctron is in two phases S1 when he is in a expansion phase, S2 when he is in contract phase. It's why the electron is a wave in his orbit in the atom. But we can observ the loops of magnetic lines field.
en français
Cher Javad, voici une illustration d'un atome avec 4 elctrons. les elctrons se déplacent autour du noyau atomique dans le même sens et 2 elctrons dans la cellule quantique ont le même temps (même vitesse), c'est pourquoi les boucles (boucle en français) de champ magnétique se forment dans chaque cellule quantique et sont localisées dans un côté spécifique de l'atome. Et de ce côté nous avons le photon de gravité qui sort. L'orbite pour chaque électron des 2 électrons dans une quantique celle, sont dans des plans parallèles. Le problème d'observer un électron dans l'atome n'est pas possible, car l'elctron est en deux phases S1 lorsqu'il est en phase d'expansion, S2 lorsqu'il est en phase contractuelle. C'est pourquoi l'électron est une onde sur son orbite dans l'atome. Mais on peut observer les boucles de champ de lignes magnétiques
Dear Javad, I continue the explanation, when you ask me if magnetism is a force internal or external to the atom in the previous explanation we saw that in the quantum cells we have two electrons which are in the same time, which makes that their lines of magnetic fields repel each other which is at the origin of these loops. When a third line of magnetic fields for example that of a magnet arrives with a different time, then the loops come undone to form with this line of magnetic fields a single magnetic line (linear) which is larger (here you have an explanation of the magnetic susceptibility of the materials which increases the magnetic field. I will come later to explain why the atom is a sound and why it is intelligent ... and on the nature of space which is in reality God ....
En Français
Cher Javad, je continue l'explication, quand vous me demandez si le magnétisme est une force interne ou externe à l'atome
dans l'explication précèdent on a vu que dans les cases quantiques on a deux électrons qui sont dans le même Temps, ce qui fait que leurs lignes de champs magnétiques se repoussent ce qui est à l'origine de ces boucles. Quand une troisième ligne de champs magnétiques par exemple celle d'un aimant arrive avec un Temps différent, alors le boucles se défont pour former avec cette ligne de champs magnétiques une seule ligne magnétique (linéaire) qui est plus volumineuse (ici vous avez une explication de la susceptibilité magnétique des matériaux qui augmente le champ magnétique.
Je viendrai par la suite pour expliquer pourquoi l'atome,est un son et pourquoi il est intelligent... et sur la nature de l'espace qui est en réalité Dieu ....
Dear Javad, following my answer The down quark, up quark, electron, gamma ray, neutrino and their anti form the ten elementary particles, they contain the divine word. and those particles derive from the Boson Higgs and its anti which is The basic breath (The Holy Spirit) which contains a word, and its anti contains the opposite. so if it is a good word, its anti contains the opposite and therefore evil (here we see the notion of good and evil). These basic breaths contract and swell and have a center, however when the Holy Spirit contracts his anti enlarges and vice versa. but have no spin i.e. do not burp on themselves. And are each in planes perpandicular to each other. When these two basic breaths therefore meet a word and its opposite, a breath and its opposite, the result of their interaction gives the quark Down and its anti which they will have a part of the word for good and a part of the bad word. part of the breath in contraction and part of the breath in magnification. which induces a rotation of the particle on itself, hence its spin. Likewise when the down quark interacts with its anti the result of the interaction gives the Up quark and its anti. just as the up quark and its anti give the electron and its anti the positron, which gives them the gamma photon and its anti which from them we obtain the neutrino and the antineutrino. Atoms are formed from these elementary particles and the Holy Spirit (Higgs Boson) is the formator. in the following way when it captures a proton, neutrons and protons come to agglutinate to form the nucleus of the atom, and when electrons are captured by this structure we have an atom. in short, the atom is the result of a summation of breaths and words, therefore expressing a sound which is a letter of the alphabet. And the atom contracts and grows too, and a breath emerges from the atom in one specific side. and this breath is the graviton.
en Français
Che Javad, suite de ma réponse
Les quark down, quark up, électron, rayon gamma , neutrino et leurs anti forment les dix particules élementaires, ils contiennent la parole divine. et ceux particule dérivent du Boson Higgs et son anti qui est Le souffle de base (L' esprit Saint ) qui contient une parole, et son anti contient le contraire. donc si c'est une parole en bien, son anti contient le contraire donc le mal (ici on voit la notion de bien et du mal) . Ces souffles de base se contractent et se gonflent et ont un centre, cependant quand l'esprit saint se contracte son anti grossit et vice versa. mais n'ont pas de de spin i.e ne rotent pas sur eux même. Et sont chacun dans des plans perpendiculaires l'un par rapport à l'autre. Quand ces deux souffles de base se rencontrent donc une parole et son contraire, un souffle et son contraire, le résultat de leur interaction donne, le quark Down et son anti qui eux vont avoir une partie de la parole en bien et une partie de la parole en mal. une partie du souffle en contraction et une partie du souffle en grossissement. ce qui induit une rotation de la particule sur elle même d’où son spin. De même quand le quark down interagit avec son anti le résultat de l’interaction donne le quark Up et son anti. de même que le quark up et son anti donnent l'électron et son anti le positron, qui eux donne le photon gamma et son anti qui d'eux on obtient le neutrino et l'antineutrino.
Les atomes sont formés à partir de ces particules élementaires et l'Esprit Saint ( Boson de Higgs) est le formateur. de la façon suivante quand il capture un proton, de neutron, puis des protons viennent s’agglutiner pour forme le noyau de l'atome, et quant des électrons sont capturés par cette structure on a un atome. en somme l'atome est le résultat d'une sommation de souffles et de paroles donc exprimer un son qui est une lettre de l'alphabet.
Et l'atome se contracte et grossit aussi, et un seul souffle émerge de l'atome dans un seul côté spécifique. et ce souffle est le graviton..
Dans l'attraction entre les aimants, comme dans l'attraction Soleil - Terre en supprimant la lumiere du Soleil, on peut comprend le mécanisme des Trous noirs, car les trous noirs n'émettent pas la lumiere, qui elle repousse la gravité de la Terre côté diurne, tandisque côté nuit, la gravité repousse les lignes de champs magnétique de la Terre, ce qui fait garder que la terre sur un orbitre spécifique au lieu d'être capturée par le Soleil. (voir document attaché)
Dear Javad, I continue on the discussion, to bring these new elements. When particles are in very distant times, they can be transparent to each other, which explains the virtual particles that quantum mechanics makes use of, or the quantum fluctuations of vacuum. This explains why we have several superposed worlds which are in different Times transparent to each other. When a word is spoken by God it is included in the Holy Spirit (Bosson Higgs) who is in a Time known as the one with God and Qaund God decides that it is realized in a world, he puts it in this Time, and his word is manifested in the form of particles real in this Time which can interact with the particles of this Time or world. In the attraction between the magnets, as in the Sun - Earth attraction by suppressing the light from the Sun, we can understand the mechanism of black holes, because black holes do not emit light, which repels the gravity of the Earth on the light side, while on the night side, gravity pushes back the lines of the Earth's magnetic fields, which causes the earth to keep on a specific orbital instead of being captured by the Sun. (see attached document)
Cher Javad, je continue sur la discussion, pour apporter ces nouveaux éléments. Quand des particules sont dans des Temps trés éloignés, elles peuvent être transparentes l'une à l'autre ce qui explique les particules virtuelles dont fait cas la mécanique quantique, ou les fluctuations quantiques du vide. Ce qui explique qu'on a plusieurs mondes superposés qui sont dans des Temps différents transparents les uns aux autres. Quand une parole est dite par Dieu elle est englobée dans l'Esprit Saint (Boson Higgs) qui est dans un Temps dit celui auprès de Dieu et Quand Dieu décide qu'il se réalise dans un monde, il le met dans ce Temps, et sa parole se manifeste sous forme de particules réelles dans ce Temps qui peuvent interagir avec les particules de ce Temps ou monde.
Dans l'attraction entre les aimants, comme dans l'attraction Soleil - Terre en supprimant la lumière du Soleil, on peut comprend le mécanisme des Trous noirs, car les trous noirs n'émettent pas la lumière, qui elle repousse la gravité de la Terre côté diurne, tandis que côté nuit, la gravité repousse les lignes de champs magnétique de la Terre, ce qui fait garder que la terre sur un orbite spécifique au lieu d'être capturée par le Soleil. (voir document attaché)
he helicity of elementary particles in motion, like the helicity of light, is explained by the direction in which these particles or photons (magnetic field line) are released from the atom relative to the side (face) of the atom where the graviton leaves.If we take a helicity on the right, for the particles or photons which exit by the side where the graviton exits, then for the particles or photons which exit by the opposite side the helicity will be left. This is due to the direction of rotation of the lines of magnetic fields of the electrons which are in the atom. by their rotation these lines oppose the propagation of the graviton. the mechanism which allows the atom to release the graviton photons is due to the fact that when the electron is on the opposite side from the side where the gravity exits, it is expanding (inflates) therefore exerting a push on its lines of magnetic field, the space which is in the two loops of lines of magnetic fields of 2 electrons (in the same quantum cell) opens or expands to let the blasts (S2s2S2 photons of gravity) emitted by the neutrons (here the nucleus is in late contraction therefore emits a breath which is the graviton) on the other hand the breaths (s2S2s2) although emitted at this instant are blocked by the magnetic line loops. When the electron is in the side where the graviton exits it is in contraction, therefore exerts an attraction on its magnetic field lines then the magnetic field line loops of the electrons in the quantum cells close. therefore no breath is emitted, although this phase corresponds to the emission by the nucleus of breaths (S1s2S1) and (s2S1s2) see document, because the nucleus is at the end of expansion. Please note that these breaths have a rotation with respect to the rotation of the lines of magnetic fields of the electrons (they also rotate) in opposite directions so that they repel each other.
En Français
L'hélicité des particules élementaires en mouvement, comme l'hélicité de la lumière s'explique par la direction où ces particules ou photons (ligne de champ magnétique) sont libérés de l'atome par rapport au côté (face) de l'atome où sort le graviton.Si on prend une hélicité à droite, pour les particules ou photons qui sortent par le côté où sort le graviton, alors pour les particules ou photons qui sortent par le côté opposé l'hélicité sera gauche. Cela est dû au sens de rotation des lignes de champs magnétiques des électrons qui sont dans l'atome. par leur rotation ces lignes s'opposent à la propagation du graviton. le mécanisme qui permet à l'atome de libérer les photons de graviton est dû au fait quand l'electron se trouve au côté opposé du côté où sort le graviton, il est en expansion (se gonfle) donc exerce une poussée sur ses lignes de champ magnétique, l'espace qui est en les deux boucles de lignes de champs magnétiques de 2 électrons (dans une même case quantique ) s'ouvre ou s'agrandit pour laisser les souffles (S2s2S2 photons de gravité) émis par les neutrons (ici le noyau est en fin contraction donc émet un souffle qui est le graviton) par contre les souffles (s2S2s2) bien que émis à cet instant sont bloqués par les boucles de lignes magnétiques. Quand l'électron se trouve dans le côté où sort le graviton il est en contraction, donc exerce une attraction sur ses lignes de champs magnétique alors les boucles de ligne champ magnétique des électrons dans les cases quantiques se ferment. donc aucun souffle n'est émis, bien que cette phase correspond à l'émission par le noyau des souffles (S1s2S1) et (s2S1s2) voir document , car le noyau est en fin d'expansion.
Veuillez noter que ces souffles ont une rotation par rapport à la rotation des lignes de champs magnétiques des électrons (elles aussi rotent ) en directions opposées ce qui fait qu'ils se repoussent.
I have a different view of magnetism, which I do not know if it is useful to answer this question. I will state it with this, and if it is welcomed, we will continue it.
According to the model we presented, the magnetic element can be a pair of electrons in an atomic orbital. That is, two electrons with opposite spins at a certain distance from each other are a magnetic element.
For this reason we will not have magnetic unipolarity (magnetic monopole), there is also orientation. Orientation in a structure can cause rotation.
These images of a rydberd atom see link (https://www.futura-sciences.com/sciences/actualites/physique-video-atome-rydberg-millimetre-diametre-16039/), the light zones is the side where the loops of magnetic field lines of the electrons which revolve around the nucleus are located. because these lines make the light reflect
This image can also be a confirmation of the structural action presented by us.
In structural action, masses due to their spin and the presence of ether can cause each other to be repelled or absorbed.
There is no ether. Indicate at least one of its real numerical parameters.
There is no ether. Indicate at least one of its real numerical (physical) parameters.
If there is no ether, with what the moving charged particles generate their magnetic field lines, or generate light or electromagnetic waves (as a numerical parameter the bohr magneton). Or the atoms that generate gravity.
n the equation E = 1 / 2mc2 it must be understood that it is the potential energy of a particle when it is animated by the speed of light. but in reality this energy does not mean that it is the particle which is consumed in another form. but the size of its magnetic field lines that it generates. the more a particle is animated at a high speed the more its lines of magnetic fields grow, on the other hand if the speed is small its lines of magnetic fields have a small volume. it goes without saying that the electromagnetic waves which derive (when the particle is accelerated or braked, it releases its magnetic field lines which become electromagnetic waves) are either voluminous in case of high speed here we say that the energy generated is high (high), in case of low speed the energy is low or small (see in my document how the speed affects the volume of the magnetic field lines). Bohr's magneton explains it to us: The magnetic moment of the electron is: | | M → | | = - n q. ℏ/ 2 m e = - n μ B see link (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magn%C3%A9ton_de_Bohr) And the magnetic field lines are formed by a chain of bohr magneton as long as the particle remains in a constant speed. the electrons which are in the low levels (n) have a small speed compared to those which are in the high levels. the greater n is, the greater the magnetic moment M is, therefore the lines of magnetic fields generated are large. on the other hand if n is small the magnetic moment is small so the generated magnetic field lines are small. You can do a research on the emission spectrum of atoms, to see that the red light is obtained in the low levels while the blue in the high levels etc.
E = (1 / 2)mc^2 This is kinetic energy, not potential energy.
The essence of your problem is not clear. Clarify your questions.
What you are talking about is known. At the level of elementary particles, especially charged ones, the field - is electromagnetic. But wave flows are different.
Since the subject is about magnetism, I ask a question:
Why are iron, cobalt, and nickel in the periodic table, but iron, nickel, and cobalt in terms of ferromagnetic power?
That is, why does nickel replace cobalt?
The model we proposed for the magnetic element could well explain this.
I would like to know the author of this work. He does not know physics well, so the work has no scientific basis, for the following reasons:
1 Why is the speed of sound in air taken? Judging by the numerical values, this is the air of the Earth.
But on other planets they may be different. Sound is what the ear hears. For an alien, it may be different. Therefore, the 1th chosen numerical value is doubtful, since it is arbitrary and is not a fundamental physical constant.
The choice of the Earth would be justified only if it is the center of the universe.
And outside of communication with air (in the inter-star space), what about this indicator?
The sound does not propagate there.
2. Since the 1st indicator is not a fundamental physical constant, to compare it with a constant c - the speed of light in a vacuum, it is incorrect.
3. Since the 1st indicator is doubtful, the communication formula between it and the speed of light is doubtful.
In addition, this ratio eliminates dimension, however it is associated with the density of the ether, and density has a dimension of kg/m^3. The dimension accuracy is a strict rule in physics.
If there is no connection with the dimension, it must be substantiated (obtained), or it is not density, but some unknown indicator.
4. Elastic ratio to ether density.
Where did the square root formula come from? How is it justified?
On the same basis, it was possible to take the cube root, since the ether is associated with space.
5. The Elasticity / Density ratio is compared with the speed of light s ^ 2, which leads to the dimension m ^ 2 / s ^ 2. It does not fit with the dimension of the Elasticity and Density values, or with their absence.
6. It is these all indicators you can know?
In those that you brought, there are no qualitative differences from the usual space, they only replace them.
Thus, all of the given parameters are arbitrary. They are artificially invented, without any connection between themselves and with other known physical quantities. Therefore, they cannot be constants of ether.
There are three sections here:
One: You said that the author knows nothing about physics. The question is, what is physics?
This is a runaway and the destruction of others. Such a statement has no place in a scientific dialogue. You can make your own critiques. If you wish, we can talk about what physics is in the future.
Two: You wanted a numerical and physical parameter about ether, not a physical constant. Of course, the author provided you with two numerical estimates.
Quotation: "There is no ether. Indicate at least one of its real numerical parameters.
There is no ether. Indicate at least one of its real numerical (physical) parameters.
2. Since the 1st indicator is not a fundamental physical constant, to compare it with a constant c - the speed of light in a vacuum, it is incorrect."
Three: About the reviews ( I answer all of them in one paragraph):
Why was the speed of sound considered in the air? Because here the author made a simple comparison, light and sound, air and ether. He compared the emission of sound in the air with the emission of light in the ether. This is a reasonable comparison. The relation used is the well-known relation of the velocity of waves propagating in a continuous material elastic medium.
Now three questions:
· One: Is not the universal gravity constant (G) measured on Earth? So why is it called a universal constant?
· Two: How do you describe the mechanism for the absorption of objects under Newtonian gravity or the absorption and repulsion of electric charges? Do you believe that waves propagate in a vacuum?
· Three: What is your answer to the question about iron, cobalt, nickel?
We need a fundamental overhaul of physics.
Appendix1: In introducing structural action, we have shown how spin can create spatial orientation and cause repulsion and absorption. We also showed there that the gravity constant (G) is not universal but related to the ether and system parameters.
Appendix 2: How do you, who are so precise, accept that in special relativity, the speed of light is considered as the speed limit of physical phenomena, or that all Inertial frame of reference are equivalent? How do you accept that in general relativity matter or energy can affect geometry? How do you accept that the accelerated electron does not radiate or that the radiation is only quantum? Do you have strong evidence for this? Or are these just vague assumptions to circumvent the challenges?
Contrary to popular belief, there is ether, and without ether there would be no mechanism for physical theories unless you believe that something beyond physics rules material systems.
https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B0
Physics (from ancient Greek φύσις - nature) is the field of natural science: the science of the most general laws of nature, of matter, its structure, movement and the rules of transformation. The concepts of physics and its laws underlie the entire natural science [1] [2]. It is an exact science.
I just quote and check it out carefully:
"Physics (from ancient Greek φύσις - nature) is the field of natural science: the science of the most general laws of nature, of matter, its structure, movement and the rules of transformation. The concepts of physics and its laws underlie the entire natural science [1] [2]. It is an exact science."
I completely agree with this definition. I also believe that physics means communicating concepts, calculations, observations, and applications. Also express why and how. Of course, I consider the most important task of physics to be the understanding of the mechanism of material systems (nature).
My questions in the previous comment were about mechanisms. Please do not forget to reply to it. Also, do not forget about the main topic of this section, which is about magnetic properties.
I believe that magnetic property is due to the internal structural orientation of matter and, of course, its general orientation.
Dear Rashid, the orientation of atoms play a big role in magnetism, however we must understand as I described the atom above, this orientation is to be understood depending on whether the atom presents its side where the loops of magnetic field lines of its electrons which orbit around its nucleus, are localized with respect to the incident magnetic field. It goes without saying that if the incident field comes on the opposite side where there are no loops it will not be able to adhere with these loops, but if it is on the face that there are loops , the incident field adheres with these loops to form a new one, which continues in the material according to whether it meets faces where there are loops ...
Dear Boubacar,
I understand your model, but our view is that the electron pair is actually a magnetic element, not a single electron. We reviewed some of our proposed models in detail before reaching this conclusion.
The question I asked above is a key question. With this model we were able to describe many magnetic properties.
Dear Rashid, the orientation of atoms play a big role in magnetism, however we must understand as I described the atom above, this orientation is to be understood depending on whether the atom presents its side where the loops of magnetic field lines of its electrons which orbit around its nucleus, are localized with respect to the incident magnetic field. It goes without saying that if the incident field comes on the opposite side where there are no loops it will not be able to adhere with these loops, but if it is on the face that there are loops , the incident field adheres with these loops to form a new one, which continues in the material according to whether it meets faces where there are loops ... following answer: Now if we move this incident magnetic field, which is thus adhered to the magnetic field lines of the electrons, this movement causes the electron to come out of the atom. On the other hand in the atom the electron is animated by a speed, therefore as soon as it leaves it will not remain in this situation of adhesion with the incident field because of its speed, therefore it will travel through the material and there we have a current, this is the mechanism by which a variable magnetic field creates a current in a metal wire
I have already passed the age when give I have exams.
The topic of magnetism does not interest me.
My answer is related to your explanations of Ether. The ones you have given are incorrect.
You do not seem to be interested in talking about other physical issues. Because you are silent about my questions about the mechanisms. Of course I know the reason.
You called physics an exact science, but you can not explain the mechanism of gravity, you can not say that matter why and how it radiates, and you can not explain why the speed of light is considered as the speed limit of physical data.
- If there is no ether, why is the data transfer speed limited?
- What is the mechanism of propagation of waves or fields in a vacuum?
- Aren't these also appealing to you or are they not related to physics?
Magnet characteristics are because the very fundamental particle which make-up all mass is a magnet. So, the proton is a ball of magnets that produce a inverse distance cube attraction, magnetic field evolves with distance to become gravity (This unites the 4 forces as variations of magnetics characteristics, Electrons are held by photons to their distances from the nucleus (is why when electrons change energy level a photon is emitted and it avoids problems the current models of "orbits" have).
https://www.researchgate.net/project/Grand-Unified-Theory-GUT-forces
Dear Rashid Nasrolahpour!
Explain to me why I have to solve someone else's problems that are not interesting to me.
You behave like a child in a family who requires constant attention from everyone.
Further on your text:
...but you can not explain the mechanism of gravity, you can not say that matter why and how it radiates - We cannot yet! But the decision time will be soon.
...and you can not explain why the speed of light is considered as the speed limit of physical data. - We can already explain this.
...If there is no ether, why is the data transfer speed limited?
Because it is limited to other REAL fields.
...What is the mechanism of propagation of waves or fields in a vacuum? Vacuum is a state of matter in which there is no matter, but there are fields. If the vacuum is within the Universe, then there is always a gravitational field in it (and in it). The solution to the issue of its distribution will automatically resolve this issue.
...Aren't these also appealing to you or are they not related to physics?
I like it. But I am solving other problems. And my life is not enough to solve them, if I am distracted by something that does not interest me.
Best regards, Valentin Nastasenk
Clarification:
Vacuum is a state of matter in which there is no Substance, but there are fields.
Valentyn Nastasenko
"Fields"? This is an even more difficult route than a medium (ether/plenum/space/vacuum ) that supports waves. QFT has become very complex and doesn't seem to explain more than waves generated in an ether by each matter particle. What are conclusions so far (paper)?
How do you separate fields and environments?
They are the unified for the gravitational field of the Universe.
Everyone's writings show how much he knows physics. I take part in conversations that I am invited by my friends so I do not need to be seen. I think you owe me two simple apologies.
When you engage in a conversation, then you will be effective in it and Your statements will be evaluated.
You have only twice commented on the author, and it is not scientific to say so.
Your answers about vacuum and field are very weak.
Your stubbornness in not accepting the reality of ether has caused you to accept the illusion of vacuum and the presence of fields in it.
Quotation : "Vacuum is a state of matter in which there is no matter"
The obvious contradiction in this one sentence is enough for me to believe in ether more than vacuum and fields.
Let's not forget the main topic:
We propose a model in which the magnetic element is an electron pair with opposite spins. If someone has come up with another model, we can challenge each other. This will be more beneficial for physics. I'm willing to talk about what I have presented because I believe that science will only progress through direct dialogue, not just the publication of articles and books.
Don't twist my words. In the first version there was a translation inaccuracy. Further, I clarified that there is no substance, but there are fields.
"Clarification:
Vacuum is a state of matter in which there is no Substance, but there are fields."
All my statements are scientific, because they are based on reliable, previously proven laws of physics.
I repeat once again that your topic lies outside the scope of my interests. I don’t want to discuss it, but you are forcing me to do so. Thus, you are violating my rights as individuals, which are protected by the Constitution in our country.
Dear Boubacar Moussa Abdou ,
- A good clue to understanding the magnetic property is to know why the magnetic flux is closed.
- Another clue is why electric currents can produce magnetic properties.
The models we present for the magnetic element should be able to have good descriptions in this regard.
Hello,
here is a Kabbalah site that explains how God created his world. (https://www.sefaria.org/Sefer_Yetzirah?lang=bi). for a good understanding, there is the Holy Spirit (boson higgs) or roufi (for mulsuman see sura the Destiny of the quran), the numbers are the elementary particles (quark Down, quark Up, electron, gamma ray, neutrino) and the five antiparticles of these particles, then the letters are the atoms. the high number of atoms in the periodic table of the elements must be understood by the fact that if we put accents on the letters (22 letters in the kabbalah) we will obtain this number from the periodic table.
Gravity is dark energy and electromagnetic waves when stopped by gravity become dark matter, the magnetic field lines of electrons are also dark matter.
If possible, answer this question from your point of view:
- (Describe the ferromagnetic behavior of nickel) Although nickel is in the periodic table after iron and cobalt, why is it ferromagnetically between them?
Also to the following questions:
- Why is the magnetic flux a closed path?
- Why or how does an electric current cause magnetic properties?
Any model you suggest for the magnetic element should be able to answer these questions. Because these are reliable and accurate observations and a suitable model should be able to describe them.
The model we proposed for the magnetic element has such a feature.
Science and Kabbalah are on opposite approaches to the theory of knowledge. Therefore, the site has exhausted itself.
Rashid Nasrolahpour, I would like to wish you continued research and seek new evidence.
Best regards, V.A. Nastasenko
Valentyn Nastasenko
I have thought that science is a part of Kabbalah which has a wider scope.
It is difficult to consider inexplicable manipulations with numbers as a science yet. If you find of this connection snd physic and reveal the diversity of scientific discoveries arising from them, then we can continue this discussion.
Can you show how, for example, Newton's laws are derived from Kabbalah?
Thanks Valentyn Nastasenko,
I also agree with you about science and I was surprised by the Boubacar comment.
Kabbalah can form a worldview as a method of cognition. However, there is no direct path from the worldview to the formulation of NEW scientific laws.
Then out of this discussion, I'm out.
Valentyn Nastasenko
Thus (worldview) follows which is explored by science. Truth and understanding rather than the feminine values of love and mercy.
I agree with you that mere number manipulation indicates nothing. Mathematical physics should include some from of causation.
goodbye.
Ferromagnetism: Rashid, this specificity of iron, nickel, cobalt can be understood by the fact that it is enough in the arrangement of the atoms that it has a small shift of one or more atoms, and that the level of electrons are different so that when the incident magnetic field is withdrawn, the lines magnetic fields of the electrons thus chained remain adhered and form a permanent magnetic field (this is why alloys are common in permanent magnets). In the case of a paramagnetic material, we do not have this shift, the chain of electrons are in the same level (same time) and when we remove the incident field, the magnetic field lines of these electrons repel each other and them. loops are formed in atoms, magnetism disappears from materials.
Discussion on Kabbalah: in the French text see link (http://soued.chez.com/SY%20texte.html) which is more explicit in paragraph 1.10 he is : Two: the breath coming from the breath. With the breath He engraved and cut twenty two foundation letters: three mothers, seven redoubled and twelve simple; and only one breath comes from them.
Here the breath which comes from these letters (atoms) is the gravitation as I described it above. we must understand that these vibrating atoms form sounds which correspond to letters. If we summarize the world, we have matter, electromagnetic waves, gravity and sound, so where does sound come from if it is not a physical phenomenon? in the same way the elementary particles which are the vibrating numbers form sounds which correspond to the number (it is necessary to understand well in the language with which God makes his creation not all languages) Well, we have ideas in the brain which are sounds, so we have neither small mouths or small ears in the brain which make us emit or hear these ideas. question how are these sounds formed and how do we hear them?
Not sounds, but vibrations. And they can generate images (pictures) or words (when we think, we pronounce them). But this is from the field of psychology. I am interested in physics and its laws.
In a vacuum the sound does not propagate, but when we have a medium where there are atoms, the sound propagates question how can you explain this situation? the brain is made up of atoms, must what is happening inside us must not escape the laws of physics, to which current physics is not able to understand everything in this world
To continue with Kabbalah, the 3 mother letters are the radioactive atoms, uranium, carbon I don't know thaurium. near identification, the carbon atom corresponds to the letter mem, so by vibrating it pronounces this sound "mem" etc. the redoubled letters are the anions (that is to say the atoms which can capture elecetrons, here I have come to identify the oxygen atom which is the letter 'ri' so pronoce this sound etc ..) in the simple ones I came to identify 'ha' being the hydrogen atom.
Dear Rashid:
Quantum entanglement: if you have two magnets, putting one below the other, keeping them at a distance, making one move you manage to make the other, it is due to the fact that their magnetic field lines are intertwined, now reduce these magnets to two atoms, by moving one we make the other move, by reducing to two electrons by making the other move we make it move the other, in fact here the medium is their lines of magnetic field which are adhered to each other here is to handle quantum entanglement simple.
The question is about nickel.
Why is nickel ferromagnetically between iron and cobalt when it is in the periodic table after iron and cobalt?
This is important.
Sound - yes. But oscillations of electromagnetic and gravitational waves propagate in a vacuum. Modern physics has long understood this. Vibrations typical for images (pictures) in the brain also go beyond the level of sound vibrations. In addition, the very vibrations of atoms and molecules in the brain go beyond sound.
On what basis did you come to conclusions about the connection of words and letters with physical elements?
What is the method? Except for mental reasoning?
If they have experimental evidence?
Rashid Nasrolahpour.
The explanation is very simple.
Distribution of electrons in orbits in atoms:
Fe 2N 14M 8L 2K
Co 2N 15M 8L 2K
Ni 2N 16M 8L 2K
An even M is more effective than an odd one.
In this case, nickel should be better than iron, but this is not the case.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Waves