Only the right hand sides of the two are similar but not the same. The appearances look similar but with different behavings. There are several natural phenomena which are similar but totally different.

In regards to the General Leibniz rule and fractional derivatives, please see the attached article.

Because of Combinatorics, and you can use similar in fractional calculus as given in this document.

https://www3.nd.edu/~bolster/Diogo_Bolster/Publications_files/48-fracprdrule.pdf

I would like to suggest the following book:

The Calculus Gallery: Masterpieces from Newton to Lebesgue

By William Dunham

Dear Mariappan,

Thank you, I will review the document.

Dear Professor,

Very Informative.

https://math.stackexchange.com/.../why-general-leibniz-rule-and-newtons-binomial

the corrected address given by @ Jack is

https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1194948/why-general-leibniz-rule-and-newtons-binomial-are-so-similar,

which I recommend, too. JoD

Dear Professor Domsta,

Thank you so much. A very useful note to me.

Only the right hand sides of the two are similar but not the same. The appearances look similar but with different behavings. There are several natural phenomena which are similar but totally different.

In regards to the General Leibniz rule and fractional derivatives, please see the attached article.

Dear Sir,

I agree with Dr Dejenie A. Lakew. The appearance of the statements seems similar but different in applications and concept.

Jahangir

Following. I think Prof. Dejenie's arguments are scholarly.