Many people are willing to participate at brief events, such as human performances in sports events (e.g. sprint), acrobatic performances in airplane meetings, fireworks displays, sunsets, or introductions to meetings. These so-called brief events last only a couple of seconds or minutes, or are consciously perceived by individuals during a couple of seconds or minutes, that is when they pay attention to it.

Do people join so-called ‘brief’ events because they provide reliable information about past environmental conditions that allowed development and expression of these events, such as environments that allow training or art expression opportunities being proxies of other environmental conditions useful for the individuals watching the events?

Do people join brief events because they are memorized and replayed in the mind? Does this imply that the time devoted to memory experiences last much longer than the time devoted to direct observation. For instance, taking a photo will last a couple of seconds, but watching the same photo over and over again may last a lifetime.

Do people join brief events because they attract many people, providing unique opportunities for exchange among people with the same social or mental interests?

Many claim that the definition of a brief event is scale-dependent. For instance, a couple of seconds may be long for one organism and brief for another organism, or one decade may be perceived as long for an individual bird and perceived as brief for a specialist interested in human history. Does this imply that philosophically all events could be defined as brief, just depending on the scale of analysis?

More Marcel M. Lambrechts's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions