A considerable proportion of those males in our sample who had had the opportunity to observe other persons in sexual activity had responded sympathetically during their observation. The females who had had the opportunity to observe sexual activity rarely reported such sympathetic responses. (Alfred Kinsey)
Perhaps it’s because women have the unique ability to recognize when their worth is reduced to mere sexual references. But hey, let’s keep digging for the real reasons in the 1950s.
Do you really think that social media ban all sexual content to protect male sensitivities? Most women can't even say the word sex. They call it lovemaking. You need to specify female erotic turn-ons, the anatomy and stimulation technique involved in achieving orgasm to be credible. I have been asking women to explain the anomalies and contradictions in beliefs about porno orgasms for many years. They all refuse to comment.
It's pretty clear that digging into people's wounds to prove a point is unethical, no matter the topic. The fact that women might not want to engage with you on these subjects suggests they don’t feel comfortable with your perspective on sexuality. It seems like you’re implying that women are either invisible or to blame for the conversation not happening. Instead of focusing on what you think they should explain, maybe consider how your approach contributes to the problem. Open dialogue starts with respect, not judgment.
You have nothing constructive to say about sexual response. Please take your diatribe elsewhere. You clearly understand nothing about sexuality.
Oh, the irony—dismissing someone for having "nothing constructive" while offering zero substance yourself. If your entire contribution to a discussion on sexuality is to shut others down with empty condescension, maybe it’s not their understanding that’s lacking. Take your own advice and save the hollow superiority for someone who’s impressed by it.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Journal Impact Factor