Why in the age of science and technology development, research on the development of modern ecosystems still neodarwninian concepts of evolution are not fully consistent?
In the history of the development of life on Earth, the emergence of particular types, phylacteries and species of flora and fauna according to the Darwin concept of evolutionary knowledge, global cataclysms repeatedly occurred on Earth, after which the majority of flora and fauna changed to a significant degree or completely. These stages of accelerated evolution leading to the relatively rapid emergence of many new life forms, characterized by completely new forms of life organization of particular types and species and entire ecosystems, are not fully fully understood, researched and explained. These gaps of knowledge are the source of dogmatic undermining of the entire Darwinite theory of evolution. In view of the above, the question still remains: Why in the age of science and technology development, research on the development of modern ecosystems still neodarwninian concepts of evolution are not fully consistent?
Please, answer, comments. I invite you to the discussion.
Dariuz:
There is absolutely no ambiguity in the application of Neodarwinian paradigm to explain the evolution and prediction of future life on planet Earth, which originated some 3.8 Billion Years ago and during this time it witnessed The Big FIVE Mass Extinction events during Phanerozoic. No catastrophic event like Bollide impact or Flood Basalt etc. could be invoked to explain the global extinction/innovation of Terrestrial Life at high to low latitudes, Deep to shallow sea, except causing local loss of Life. Scientific literature is littered with fallacious ideas explaining the evolution dictated by catastrophic events, which was bitterly opposed by Darwin himself, firmly believing in Gradualistic mode of evolution. Mass extinctions are explained as accidental clustering of Gradualistic Background Extinctions occurring only five times during the entire span of life on planet earth..
Best
Syed
KMT:
The idea of Goldschmidt is simply absurd. For example, Phylum Chordates to which we humans belong as per fossil record appeared ca. 600 Ma years ago coinciding with Cambrian explosion - and it cannot be be followed farthest down the geological time scale. Order Primates appeared ca. 55-58 Ma ago during Late Palaeocene. When a species is created it must belong to a Phylum ! Ontogenesis creates phylogenesis and not the other way round. It is a matter of interpretation of Neo-Darwinian concept.
Best
Syed
KMT:
Yes indeed. You are right, but do not match it with Chicken and Egg problem.
Best
Syed