I would like to perform a hydrological analysis using RCM (CORDEX) data that need to be downscaled and bias corrected prior to application. I need an advise on which tool I could use to perform this.
Gebrekidan Worku Tefera I have worked on the 0.5 degree resolution of observed data and Crodex provides the data of 0.44 degree resolution. can I use this data directly or I have to covert Cordex data to 0.5 degree? If yes, please suggest the methodologies involved there to convert them.
What matter is the resolution of your observed or re-analysis data. You can re-grid your RCMs data into the resolution you want. You can use the the bi-linear interpolation method on ArcGIS.
Gebrekidan Worku Tefera Dear Sir, Can you suggest any tutorial or way to re-grid the RCM data by Model building on ArcGIS or other than ArcGIS approach? I have number of data which can not regrid easily.
the climate projection of RCM's are usually in netcdf format. There is a software package used by the community called Climate Data Operators (CDO) that you can use to regrid (among other stuff) any gridded data in necdf format. https://code.mpimet.mpg.de/projects/cdo
As for bias adjustment of CMIP5/6 or CORDEX projections you can used the CDFt method as explained in our technical report available hereTechnical Report Bias Adjusting Climate Model Projections
If dataset in curvilinear form, only I have to change remapbil to remapbic. Are there other changes needed to be followed (steps mentioned in bilinear interpolation)?
After opening the source file (Intermediate file), I got the file description two times, one in starting and another one at the end of the source file, So, is there a need to do changes in both ones or only in starting one?
One last thing, how to find xsize and ysize for a particular grid?
Hi Ankur Vishwaka, you just need to apply either one (remabil or remapbic), and the grid description (xsize y size) is in the netcdf file meta data.. Check the CDO documentation. All the best
Engr. Muhammad Shafeeque, I am new in climate change analyses and want to evaluate that climate change impacts on water resources. I have read about downscaling and bias correction of GCM and RCM outputs but i am a little bit confuessed that if we do Bias correction for example in CMhyd, Does it mean that we did the downscaling or for that we should do other processes?
Tooryalay Ayoubi Bias correction is synonmous to downscalling. First, the historical data of the model is compared to observations and delta values generated. The values are then used to correct future data.When you plot observations against the corrected observations, similarity index approaches 1.
Thank you so much for the good explaination. now it is abit cleared for me.
I have another question related to monthly output parameters for every station. What does this parameters mean? is it also correlation between observations against the corrected observations?
I am getting a warning massage after processing in CMhyd and it says some factors are extraordinary high/low. I have seen some months have really high values in deffirent months. Please see the example below and guide me.
Tooryalay Ayoubi First, I would suggest you evaluate the models before downscalling in CMhyd. These warnings always come when you're using linear scaling meaning there is high descrepancy between observations and the model data. You can opt for distribution mapping (DM) for both rainfall and temperature. Recent literature shows that DM is best for use in CMhyd. Note that CMhyd do not include many calenders. I noted that there was mismatch between NetCDF timesteps and the CMhyd dates read from the same NetCDF. You can use CDO to check if you NetCDF file calender is either 365_DAY or Proleptic_Gregorian. You'll get some errors if your data calender 360_DAY especially in CORDEX RCMs.
Hello sir, I am also using CMhyd tool for bias correction , I have taken my observed data from 1975-2005 which is used for overlapping , then my cordex data is from 2006-2099. my problem is output of bias corrected data is from 2005 to 2036 not 2099. can someone please suggest me what i am doing wrong, i am new to this. Thank you in advance for help.
Kiprotich Paul I Would like to thanks for your help and suggestions.
I evaluated my data in CDO, as i am using 3 RCM Models (with 4 GCMs) from CORDEX (Please see the table below) and all models shows 365 days without REMO2009 which is 365 days proleptic-gregorian.
No, RCM Model, GCM_Driving_Model, Calender, Time_coordinate
1 , RCA4, CCCma-CanESM2, 365 Days, 1825 steps
2 , RCA4, MIROC-MIROC5, 365 Days, 1825 steps
3 , REMO2009, M-MPI-ESM-LR, 365 Days (proleptic_gregorian), 1826 steps
When I used these models in CMhyd using distribution mapping (DM) , The first 3 models showed error ( see attached error message) but the last one (4) was good and doesn't showed error.
Kiprotich Paul , I forgot to say that I am using WAS Domain (South Asia Domian) and my historical observed data is from 01.01.1986 - 31.12.2005 and I have five leap years (1988, 1992,1996,2000,2004) with 366 days. As the models shows 365 days, Does CDO include leap years?
CMhyd uses the meta information of a netCDF file to find the climate model grid cells that overlay the gauge locations and convert the precipitation and temperature data into millimeters and degrees Celsius, respectively. Finally, CMhyd extracts time series of the relevant grid cells by reading from the netCDF files.
Can somebody help me how to do so for monthly RCM data? Because CMhyd works only for daily data, So how can I extract and bias correct monthly RCM outputs?