Certainly, identifying the most important questions in physics, including cosmology, astronomy, quantum mechanics, and information theory, that have the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the world is a challenging task, as the field is vast and constantly evolving. However, here is the first fundamental question that hold significant promise in reshaping our perception of the universe:

The Nature of Dark Matter and Dark Energy:

One of the most profound mysteries in cosmology is the nature of dark matter and dark energy. Dark matter is thought to make up a significant portion of the universe's mass, yet it remains undetected through electromagnetic radiation. Dark energy, on the other hand, is believed to be responsible for the universe's accelerating expansion. Understanding what dark matter and dark energy truly are could revolutionize our understanding of the universe's composition and its ultimate fate.

The second question:

The Unified Theory of Fundamental Forces:

Physicists have made remarkable progress in understanding three of the four fundamental forces in the universe: gravity, electromagnetism, and the strong nuclear force. However, a unifying theory that encompasses all four forces, including the weak nuclear force, remains elusive. A successful theory of everything, often referred to as a Grand Unified Theory or Theory of Everything (TOE), could provide a unified framework for understanding the fundamental forces and particles in the universe, potentially revolutionizing our understanding of physics at its core.

The third question.

Quantum Gravity and the Nature of Space-Time:

The conflict between quantum mechanics, which describes the behavior of particles on a small scale, and general relativity, which governs the behavior of gravity and the large-scale structure of the universe, is one of the most significant challenges in physics. Discovering a theory that unifies quantum mechanics and gravity, often referred to as quantum gravity, could revolutionize our understanding of space-time itself. This could lead to insights into the nature of black holes, the beginning of the universe, and the fundamental structure of reality.

Dear Khodabakhsh Zabihi Afratakhti

About black holes:

Scientists have found the first evidence of black hole rotation

https://www.space.com/historic-donut-black-hole-is-spinning-new-study-finds

An international team of researchers managed to obtain the first direct evidence of the rotation of a black hole after analyzing images taken over more than 20 years.

Scientists from Japan, South Korea, China and other countries published their findings in the scientific journal Nature.

Experts used a network of radio telescopes around the world to observe the black hole at the center of the M87 galaxy, which is located 55 million light-years from Earth. The resulting images show a powerful jet escaping from the black hole at almost the speed of light.

According to the researchers, data analysis showed that the direction of the jet changes over approximately an 11-year period, NHK reports.

The findings support supercomputer calculations by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan based on theoretical simulations that the black hole is rotating.

The Story of Our Universe May Be Starting to Unravel

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/02/opinion/cosmology-crisis-webb-telescope.html?auth=login-google1tap&login=google1tap

Not long after the James Webb Space Telescope began beaming back from outer space its stunning images of planets and nebulae last year, astronomers, though dazzled, had to admit that something was amiss. Eight months later, based in part on what the telescope has revealed, it’s beginning to look as if we may need to rethink key features of the origin and development of the universe.

Launched at the end of 2021 as a joint project of NASA, the European Space Agency and the Canadian Space Agency, the Webb, a tool with unmatched powers of observation, is on an exciting mission to look back in time, in effect, at the first stars and galaxies. But one of the Webb’s first major findings was exciting in an uncomfortable sense: It discovered the existence of fully formed galaxies far earlier than should have been possible according to the so-called standard model of cosmology.

According to the standard model, which is the basis for essentially all research in the field, there is a fixed and precise sequence of events that followed the Big Bang: First, the force of gravity pulled together denser regions in the cooling cosmic gas, which grew to become stars and black holes; then, the force of gravity pulled together the stars into galaxies.

The Webb data, though, revealed that some very large galaxies formed really fast, in too short a time, at least according to the standard model. This was no minor discrepancy. The finding is akin to parents and their children appearing in a story when the grandparents are still children themselves.

It was not, unfortunately, an isolated incident. There have been other recent occasions in which the evidence behind science’s basic understanding of the universe has been found to be alarmingly inconsistent.

Take the matter of how fast the universe is expanding. This is a foundational fact in cosmological science — the so-called Hubble constant — yet scientists have not been able to settle on a number. There are two main ways to calculate it: One involves measurements of the early universe (such as the sort that the Webb is providing); the other involves measurements of nearby stars in the modern universe. Despite decades of effort, these two methods continue to yield different answers.

At first, scientists expected this discrepancy to resolve as the data got better. But the problem has stubbornly persisted even as the data have gotten far more precise. And now new data from the Webb have exacerbated the problem. This trend suggests a flaw in the model, not in the data.

Two serious issues with the standard model of cosmology would be concerning enough. But the model has already been patched up numerous times over the past half century to better conform with the best available data — alterations that may well be necessary and correct, but which, in light of the problems we are now confronting, could strike a skeptic as a bit too convenient.

The old and new idea

Israelis:

We follow the recommendations of Mr. Putin -

KILL THE TERRORISTS IN THE OUTLOOK!!!