I am working on a learning system that needs to consider user's personality and emotions in learning context. Which personality model in your opinion suits best in this scenario ?
The big 5 is the most widely used measure of personality and thus the most tested. There is debate on whether the 5-factors are as valid as they are portrayed. Some argue there is a 6th factor or actually only 3-4 factors.
Carl Jung's model has actually been distorted by "pop-science" with the popularity of the Myers-Briggs which is very loosely based off of Jung's theory and not valid or reliable in the slightest. I don't know of any "good' measures that are based completely off of Jung's work (though the Big 5 was influenced by his theories).
I'm not as familiar with FSLSM, but given the other dimensions, I think that emotion and color would relate strongly to the Sense and Visual factors which depending on your study could be a good Positive control, but the model is not as widely used as the other two.
My suggestion would to use the Big 5 NEO-PI and look at the 5 factors AND the facets of each factor. I'd expect there may be some interesting differential effects and there is a great deal of literature linking the Big 5 and the facets to learning, so the link would be easy and reasonable to make.
Best of Luck.
Dear!
Abhishak sexena
Thanks for such detailed and comprehensive answer.
If you need a reference on what Abhishek already stated take a look at the linked paper. It provides a discussion of the properties of FFM (BigFive) and MBTI and concludes that we should use FFM (as stated by psychologist since two decades).
Conference Paper Ants in the OCEAN: Modulating Agents with Personality for Pl...
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science and Engineering
- Human-Computer Interaction