The legal status or the medico-legal significance of officially approved or endorsed clinical decision support and quality improvement tools like; (i) 'Evidence-Based' Clinical Practice Guidelines, (ii) Protocols, (iii) Integrated Care Pathways, and (iv) Policies and Procedures has been a long-standing debate that often have a positive or even a negative effect on the compliance of different healthcare providers especially physicians.

I would like to open a discussion on your perspective and perception of that concept and what is the reality in your healthcare context in your country or region (insight from all clinical specialties is appreciated)?

More Yasser Sami H. Abdel Dayem Amer's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions