Hi all, besides biodiversity, soil stability and carbon fluxes, which other indicators of chronic disturbance in dryland systems could enable the establishment of a robust and adaptive monitoring framework?
Thank you very much for your insights...highly appreciated! I will look at the Mexican case study by Huber-Sannwald et al. 2012; seems very interesting!
Skimmed through the publications...must say it's a nice read. Thanks!
My concern is that we need more (like five) indicators to evaluate the impact of various chronic disturbances besides the biodiversity indexes (like in your case), soil stability or carbon fluxes as is normally the case.
Having more indicators will offer conclusive insights on the impact and extent of various disturbances. To me, this is critical given the volatility of some of the indicators such as carbon...
I would suggest the methodological toolbox of a "Rapid Ecosystem Functioning Assessment" (REFA), as published by Sebastian Meyer from Munich and his colleagues:
We already tested some of these methods - such as the artificial caterpillars as a rapid method to assess natural pest control - in West African rangelands. The good thing is, that due to the quick&easy assessment methods, you get a more holistic picture of how disturbance regimes affect multiple aspects of ecosystem functionality and ecosystem service provision.