If we want to simulate the displacement and deformation of the ground beneath a structure when an earthquake occurs, I would say that it looks like a rough sea but with a lower density. The difference between a ship and a building in a turbulent sea and in an earthquake is that the sea adapts its shape in the wave to the shape of the ship, whereas in an earthquake the building adapts its shape to the wave-like shape of the ground. This difference is disastrous for structures with a large area and for tall structures which are more vulnerable to the large wave oscillation and low frequencies. The structure in large earthquakes bends by rocking in all directions of the horizontal, vertical and torsional axis,. One floor with another have different width and direction of displacement along the horizontal axis and one sub-structure with another sub-structure of the same floor have different height difference, deforming plates and beams.
The torsional bending deformations of the elements in all directions are as strong as the deformations of a crumpled aluminium foil.
I say all this to indicate the necessity of elasticity of structural elements.
Normally only a rubber structure would withstand such an earthquake, although even in tall buildings it would have the problem of overturning. The question I ask is why don't we build houses out of rubber?
The answer is simple. Anything that is elastic has no momentum. What is rigid has momentum, but it breaks when bent.
E.g. a rubber beam will bend under its own weight, let alone when we impose loads on it.
In contrast, a reinforced concrete beam will take large loads and will break at a small bend in its frame.
Still anything that is dynamic is easily overturned, and overturning means building footprint withdrawal and failure from unsustainable static loads.
And the question that comes up is this.
What building construction design offers stability,elasticity and dynamic together, so that in any deformation it does not fail and at the same time has more dynamic than existing buildings, without overturning the structure and without twisting - base recall in the walls?
That is, that the columns go up and down like pistons without the beams breaking, and that the columns bend without breaking either themselves or the beams and slabs, and that all elements of the structure can withstand greater static loads, and of course seismic dynamic loads, without wall base recall and overturning?
Say what design is proposed to build structures to these specifications that will solve the earthquake problem?
I suggest this design method in the video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO6MxxH0lMU&t=1s
Dear Ioannis Lymperis ,
It's great what you wrote, again... There's a problem with revealing your secrets... No one reacts to it. Some people watch it: they get inspiration. They are in a position where if they use your ideas, they will be paid a lot without mentioning you... That's why it was good that I started running my Geo-Intuition YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/@Geo-Intuition . Because that's how I was able to realize a fundamental truth that represents the globalist world from every angle.
It is a big pump: the pump of any kind of wealth (money, ideas, existence, morals, etc.) ... It sucks everything up, as if a thief were holding this pump.
I know how to defend against it, study the Tao.
It's easy to give advice.
That's all I'm saying. Make videos and I will help you. I just need permission for your videos. to share on my channel.
It looks like I'll be traveling in China with my ex- Chinesewife in mid-September (for 30 days), After that I want to make better videos.
Regards,
László
My friend László Attila Horváth you are absolutely right in what you say.
But unfortunately I haven't found a way to make money with my ideas. There was a time when I thought that some researchers and some entrepreneurs would work with me for the good of all. I was approached by several people for collaboration but in the end they wanted to steal my ideas.
I am always much more forward in my research than what I reveal in my writings. But to realize my ideas I need money, which I don't have. If you think we can do something together, I'd be happy to work with you.
If you want to tell me more at [email protected]
Dear Ioannis Lymperis ,
It's all simple. The world should not be seen as some people force us to see it. Children as young as 3 years old are already being fooled in institutions linked to the state.
Individuals who have performed best in such an educational context are placed in a decision-making position. It will mostly be doctors and professors who are most likely to be bought into the communication of false narratives in many cases.
It is very difficult to thrive in such an environment.
I understood the rest
Regards,
Laszlo
Dear Samy Elhadi Oussadou
Increase the bearing capacity of the foundation soil. The soil by its nature is inhomogeneous with different composition and bearing capacity It exhibits inhomogeneous settlement from base to base when subjected to large earthquake loads as it also exhibits the phenomenon of liquefaction during the earthquake. This is disastrous for the cross-sections around the nodes which deform fishy. It is important to sample soil ( carrots ) to check its composition before it is assigned to receive the loads of the structure. The drilling of boreholes for the placement of the footing mechanisms also reveals its quality to us.
Still stretching the footing mechanism with jacks compacts the soil horizontally and vertically, increasing its bearing capacity in receiving the axial compressive and tensile loads. The footing mechanisms pick up the seismic and static loads and distribute them to deeper and stronger areas of the soil. The strong compacted soil regions around the boreholes under the structure, during the earthquake, collide with the elastic soil regions surrounding them, counteracting the large displacements due to horizontal elastic damping. However, there are also the vertical displacements caused by the drumbeats of the ground on the one hand and by the wave-like shape of the ground during the earthquake, which pushes the foundations up and down like pistons and breaks the load-bearing elements. This phenomenon affects structures with a large area.For this reason, a seismic joint is necessary every 30 meters. The mentioned method proposes a new solution to prevent the destruction of the load-bearing structure with a large area, due to the undulating shape of the ground which will be analysed below.
We construct an elastic structure with column beams and very transverse reinforcement to achieve maximum elasticity to elastically take up the undulating soil form. To protect this structure from horizontal inelastic displacement we place in and at the corners of the structure independently tensed and embedded in the ground wells in which we place seismic joint at the height of the diaphragms ( in the slabs.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IO6MxxH0lMU&t=40s
- Badges
- Science topic