There is a Genocide Convention. Here is the key part:

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group, as such:

(a) Killing members of the group;

(b) Causing serious physical or mental harm to members of the group;

(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to

bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

Thus: the population cannot decrease. It is legal to stabilize the population, but illegal to decrease it. If the population decreases: illegal "Causing serious mental harm" contributing to extinction. Therefore, from the point of view of biological well-being: politicians are divided into a subset that ignores laws against genocide, and one that does not. And today the second subset is empty.

According to the definition of genocide, what has occurred over the past 15 months can be classified as full-scale genocide, and what Trump is proposing is another form of genocide. However, given the resilience and patience demonstrated by the people of Gaza, this plan is unlikely to succeed. The countries designated to receive the forcibly displaced Palestinians from Gaza; Egypt and Jordan have openly rejected the plan, at least for now. Both countries rely on significant aid from the U.S., amounting to billions of dollars, which they genuinely need. It remains to be seen whether Trump will be able to force their compliance. My belief is that this plan is fundamentally flawed and will not achieve its intended outcome.

There is a definicion^

In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

An interesting assessment of the situation arises if we strictly follow the definition of genocide. In the Gaza Strip, we can talk about an attempt at genocide. But we also need to look at the birth rate at that time. If they gave birth to few, and the number fell: then genocide. And if the birth rate covered military losses: then it would be just an unsuccessful attempt at genocide.

Genocide and for a long time: this is in New York, for example. The population there does not reproduce.

Yasser Arafat had a slogan "Our main weapon is the womb of a woman." In my opinion, it was in vain that this was forgotten.

By the way: my long-time head of the laboratory, a citizen of Israel, an ethnic Ashkenazi: believed that the "Arab people of Palestine" are the descendants of Jews who accepted Islam (that is, a newer version of the same Abrahamic religion). Perhaps a similar situation is in Yemen. Moreover, according to mitochondrial DNA, Ashkenazis are largely northern Italy.

Moreover: the Palestinians should have acted by peaceful means. After all, the Ashkenazis are simply disoriented by their leadership. They were simply convinced that Israel is their homeland.

I agree that the Palestinians are people who were living in that part of the world and changed their religion from Jews to Christianity or Islam and some of them kept their Jewish religion. There is a good portion of Palestinian Christians today in Palestine. My conclusion is that both Palestinians and Israelis deserve better leadership which prioritizes peace to war and have realistic thinking. This starts with the idea that both Israelis and Palestinians are equal human beings and therefore should be treated equally. Respecting international law would be another important point. Illegal settlements and illegal occupation should end and then either have two sovereign states living side by side peacefully or one democratic state where every one has equal rights in all aspects. I think good leadership and international pressure are key elements in succeeding this goal. United states of America which has been an obstacle to any solution in this issue should wake up and push to wards peace rather than proposing ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from Gaza. The Gazans have made it very clear that they will never leave Gaza because they know that if they leave Gaza they will not be allowed to return back as the case of 1948 to 1967. It is worth mentioning that majority of Gazans are descendants of those who were displaced from their homes in todays Israel in 1948 to 1967.

I agree that religion is one thing, and rights to territory are another. Otherwise, religion will be a cover for aggression.

Of course, some Jews have historical rights to part of Palestine. And they lived there without problems with the world of Islam. But let's remember the well-known fact: it seems that the Ashkenazis do not appear in history until the 7th century. Moreover, according to genetic data, there were very few of them at that time. And the genes of the Semites do not dominate there in all respects even today. The option that they were previously subjected to genocide in Europe is not obvious: then, in Europe, the persecution of Christians has most likely recently ceased.

Meanwhile, the trend of declaring oneself a Jew is known even without the Ashkenazis. They are the second largest such group. And the first are the Mormons, there are already more of them than Ashkenazis. They arose two hundred years ago, and everything is known about their origin.

This does not mean that the Ashkenazis do not deserve sympathy. If you put yourself in their place: it's crazy.