Many times it happens that strategic deciciones taken by specialists who have had an important career and became managers.

This sets up a problem, but can be remedied by adding professional generalist disciplines that although they can not give specific solutions-dominate the whole process of organziación-and can provide the necessary general look.

Therefore, I think decición processes should be given to the composition of these two looks. If it is necessary that there should be two professionals to do this, I think you might get better results.

You might find interesting this article of mine that describes a framework to assess and manage intellectual capital assets in a strategic/tactical perspective https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239716077_The_assessment_of_the_intellectual_capital_impact_on_the_value_creation_process_a_decision_support_framework_for_top_management

Article The assessment of the intellectual capital impact on the val...

Thank you so much for your valuable contribution.

using H A Simon's stages in decision making: Intelligence, Design and choice, i think intellectual capital will be very useful at the intelligence phase where decision conditions are identified. i hold this thinking because the success of otherwise of any strategic decision is largely a function of how correctly the decision condition or problem has been identified.