Hi ! I'm doing my first review article and I wanted to know if you had tips or time to peer-review what I tried to achieve. Thank you for your help in advance ! I have to sum-up and comment on 4 pages on an article asking [When Will Negotiation Agents Be Able to Represent Us](https://homepages.cwi.nl/~baarslag/pub/When_Will_Negotiation_Agents_Be_Able_to_Represent_Us-The_Challenges_and_Opportunities_for_Autonomous_Negotiators.pdf)

The only things I had to respect but the template were :

- to do a summary of the article (in particular I should highlight the answers to the following questions: why the problem is interesting and important, what are the contributions and why are they important, what is the place of this article in the literature? )

- a personal critique of the article. In this review, I have to try to find the positives and negatives of the article (for example, did I understand the evidence, do they have enough detail, what would you have liked? find more in the article that is not there, what you found good in the article and who is there, etc ...) and to try to suggest ways to extend the work of the authors.

As far as it was my first attempt I followed the [wikihow guide to summarize a journal article](https://www.wikihow.com/Summarize-a-Journal-Article) I know I should have rather used the [How to Write an Article Review](https://www.wikihow.com/Write-an-Article-Review) ...

[Here](https://www.overleaf.com/read/jbqpxvqdcybp) is my attempt. You can clone it with git with the following link : https://git.overleaf.com/15169278xzdfgnjvfmrb

Thank you very much for you help !

Similar questions and discussions