Hydraulic Fracturing Whether mobility and diffusivity will get influenced

if the viscosity of the injected fluid

remains significantly different

from that of the pore-fluid

in the reservoir?

And in turn,

would influence ‘fracture toughness’ and ‘strain modulus’?

If so, fracture toughness can be assumed to be insignificant?

When the crack keeps propagating

within the reservoir formation,

how exactly to define the fluid flow regime

within the crack:

As an Elliptic PDE

because of the closure by the fracture tip

(depending only on the fracture surface boundary values and remaining time-independent)

or

as a parabolic PDE

by assuming a connected fracture network

(with time-dependency as well)?

As the fracture density keeps increasing with time,

whether the fluid storage within the fracture

will still remain negligible

in comparison

with that of

the volume of the fluid injected?

Apart from far-field stress and pore-pressure;

whether viscosity, mobility, diffusivity, elastic modulus and the fluid injection rate - can be considered (approximated)

to be a constant?

Can the fluid flow in a crack

be described

using Reynolds lubrication equation,

when the crack remains closed at its tip

(with zero fracture aperture thickness at a point along its flow direction)?

Can we simply approximate it using a Neumann type boundary condition - by

assuming that the fluid flux gets vanished @ the crack tip)?

Whether application of superposition of elastic dislocations

using singular integral equation

remain valid

for a crack with warped (undulated or zig-zag) fracture surfaces?

In the absence of asymmetry,

can we deduce elastic kernel?

Will it be feasible to deduce

the reduction in pore-pressure loss

resulting from the fluid leak-off (from the crack) -

from that of the additional pore-pressure

induced from the generated cracks –

following the distribution of

initial pore-pressure

at early times?

More Suresh Kumar Govindarajan's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions