when do you think that the first academic paper written by AI will successfully pass the peer-review?
While we can't predict an exact timeline, it's likely that we'll see the first academic paper written by AI successfully pass peer-review soon.
Currently, AI-generated content is becoming increasingly sophisticated, with tools like ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) capable of producing coherent and well-structured text ¹. However, there are still concerns about the accuracy, reliability, and transparency of AI-generated content.
To address these concerns, publishers and academic institutions are establishing guidelines for the use of AI in academic writing. For instance, the Journal of Medical Internet Research has outlined policies for authors, peer reviewers, and editors on the use of generative AI in academic publishing ¹.
Given the rapid advancements in AI technology and the growing acceptance of AI-generated content, it's possible that we'll see the first AI-written academic paper pass peer-review within the next few years. However, it's essential to ensure that such papers meet the same rigorous standards as human-written papers and that the use of AI is transparent and properly disclosed.
what are your views on this ?
I'd like to invite you to read this article, I shall review it within some days:
Article How to increase our learning considering The impact of artif...
In conclusion, while ChatGPT and similar AI programs offer unique opportunities for higher education, institutions must be aware of their limitations and challenges. By striking a balance between leveraging the benefits of AI technologies and addressing their shortcomings, while ensuring ethical use, higher education can fully embrace the potential of AI as a powerful learning tool for students and educators alike.
The first academic paper written by AI will pass peer-review because it is mindful of the fact the paper will be subjected to peer-review. So, whatever whatever plagiarised material(s) that could undermine the integrity of the paper is eliminated automatically by AI device.
My stance.
Dr. Matthias O. Nkuda
It shouldn't take many years. I share the opinion of my colleague Dr Matthias O. Nkuda. Of course, like many others, I have some misgivings about this. And I believe that the use of AI should be completely transparent. I have nothing against a creative, controlled use of AI (I did a first experiment last year with my students, making a video, and it went well), but in other fields I confess to being very reluctant to use it.
Thank you dear colleague, Carlos Alberto Matos Trindade for aligning with my perspective on this question. However, if you had differed, it would not made any difference to me because my perspective would still have remained my perspective.
Thanks a lot.
Cheers.
Dr. M. O. Nkuda
The first academic paper written by AI may successfully pass peer review within the next few years, but the timeline is uncertain. AI is already capable of generating coherent and data-driven content, and as models like GPT and specialized AI tools improve, their ability to produce academically rigorous papers will increase. However, peer review is a complex process that involves not just technical accuracy but also originality, critical thinking, and the ability to contribute to the field. While AI can assist in drafting and analyzing data, the challenge will be in demonstrating novelty and relevance—qualities that remain difficult for AI to fully replicate. It's likely that AI-generated papers could pass peer review first in more technical fields, where the content is more formulaic, but it will take longer for AI to gain acceptance in more subjective, qualitative research areas.
The first academic paper written by AI could successfully pass peer review within the next few years, especially in technical fields where AI can assist in data analysis and model building. However, for AI to fully pass peer review, it would need to demonstrate originality, critical thinking, and the ability to contribute meaningful insights, which are still challenging for AI. As AI tools improve, particularly in research areas requiring less subjective interpretation, it's likely we’ll see AI-generated papers pass peer review in the near future.
The question of when the first academic paper written by AI will successfully pass peer review is complex and largely depends on the journal's policies and transparency standards. In fact, it may have already happened without public acknowledgement. Some journals do not require full disclosure of the extent of AI assistance used in writing or generating content. As AI tools become more sophisticated, they are increasingly capable of producing coherent, well-structured, and technically accurate texts that mimic human academic writing. If an AI-generated paper is submitted without disclosing its origin, and if the content meets the journal’s standards, it could very well pass peer review unnoticed.
However, for a paper officially recognized as written by AI to pass peer review, it will take time and likely vary depending on the discipline. Some fields, like computer science or AI research, may be more open to this innovation, especially if the goal is to explore the limits and capabilities of AI in academic authorship. Ethical and philosophical concerns remain, particularly regarding accountability, authorship rights, and the integrity of scientific discourse.
In short, while it is possible that an AI-written paper has already passed peer review under the radar, an openly acknowledged and accepted AI-authored paper will likely emerge soon in progressive, tech-focused journals. The timeline depends not on AI’s capabilities—which are advancing rapidly—but on how quickly academic institutions adapt their policies to address these new realities.
https://www.proof-reading-service.com/blogs/ai-in-scholarly-publishing/the-do-s-and-don-ts-of-ai-use-in-academic-research-and-publishing
An AI-authored academic paper could successfully pass peer review within the next 2–3 years, especially in fields like computer science or mathematics. This will likely occur with minimal human editing and growing acceptance of AI-assisted research.
The following article offers recommendations to uphold the rigor of peer review—an imperfect system, yet still the best we have in scholarly publishing...
Ensuring peer review integrity in the era of large language models: A critical stocktaking of challenges, red flags, and recommendations
The academic community must remain flexible, open-minded, and cautious in continually assessing the capabilities and imitations of LLMs to safeguard the integrity of peer review and scientific research...
Article Ensuring peer review integrity in the era of large language ...
Dear Sandeep Savitaprakash Sharma , you may visit the following discussions where you will find examples of AI as an author , AI peer review..., how to fight against...It happens already!
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_AI_be_a_coauthor_of_a_scientific_paper
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Should_Generative_AI_assistant_scientific_writing_treated_the_same_as_plagiarism
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Science
- Media