What's the best method for having a good result of depth estimation for potantial field data (gravity and magnetics)?
I've tried with proposed methods based on diffrent articles, but it seems none of them gives very good results.
I am wondering what do you suggest?
There is no single best technique for depth estimations in potential field data interpretation . It is preferable to consider known depth of geology from boreholes or other geophysical results in the study area. It is also recommended to use different depth estimation techniques for the same data and compare results.
Gravity method is best for hunting regional structures and will be best for depth probing as well
Dear Yahya Ali Abdulkadir,
Thank you very much for your reply. That is correct that best is to combine multideciplanary methods but in case we don't have data except potential field data (Gravity and magnetic) we are no chice but using those datasets.
Dear Yasin,
What is possible is to compare different depth estimation techniques. For instance compare results from Euler, Tilt angle, Analytic signal, Horizontal derivative and other Edge and Depth estimation techniques and look results of these techniques for a single anomaly.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Materials Science
- Materials
- Inorganic Materials
- Metals
- Alloys
- Steel