What view of the environment do modern Psychology theories and research give us?

I see it as very superficial (often vague ; more related to terminology or to concepts or to models THAN TO REAL ASPECTS OF ENVIRONMENTS/empiricism/phenomenology). The research is also disjointed, and oftentimes: made-up story-telling with absolutely no real research supporting its central suppositions.

In any case it does not show a detailed, realistic, multi-faceted or progressive embeddedness with our environment AND NO PROGRESS IS REALLY BEING MADE. The fact that Psychology has basically been this way "forever" (for its entire100 yr. history) does NOT make the present performance "ok".

I see this as a real problem (a big one), and as an indicator of the causes as well: [ unfortunately VERY LIKELY ] other major problems, with the researchers' approaches and theories (problems due do deficiencies I see them as having IN COMMON). Thus, we have some real problems, AND YET I see nothing noteworthy leading to any good (real) solution.

Isn't that what you see, and what most people see?

See: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_does_no_theory_view_perspective_approach_make_me_think_it_is_amazing_all_the_ways_we_are_connected_with_so_many_aspects_of_our_environment also

(I have a Project and papers, available through RG, that address the problems -- see my Profile (and under Project, under Project Log, see all Updates).)

More Brad Jesness's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions