I did something similar for driving an IR laser diode at up to 2.5 amps, ended up using a Darlington output transistor.
Modeling this circuit for 0 to 3.5 volts in to give 0 to 3.5 amps out (again thinking about use for a LD driver) with a +5V supply rail, a standard PNP power transistor needed about -78mA output for the base, which is a bit hard for many op-amps! Changing to a TIP147 took that down to 0.6mA which is better.
Not exactly. The output is not needed to be RR. Only the opamp input common mode voltage range is important, in OPA1 it should include ground, in OPA2 supply rail.
In our case OPA2 must be RRIO to be able to control current of an output transistor for small input voltage. Another possibilities see for example pgs 211-212 in
I like vacuum tubes as (in most cases) one can actually see the basic elements of the active device and it is (relatively) easy to visualize the operation.
This is unlike semiconductors which are microscopic in operation and normally tucked away in a blob of something - with an arcane set of letters and numbers printed on the outside which ironically can cause great excitement or a yawn of indifference.
Also vacuum tubes operate on real electron flow, whereas most other circuit paths are electron wave in operation (the electrons themselves moving at very slow speeds (down to cm/sec which is finger waving velocities!)).
And there are still a few circuits where a vacuum tube can do things that solid state cannot. So I see vacuum tube electronics as a niche specialty, rather than just something from history.
A great idea where a voltage source (tube, emitter or source follower) "helps" a current source (common anode, collector or drain stage). The same situation exists in the differential stage above when we adjust the current produced by the common emitter current source and the two emitter followers (connected in parallel) react by changing their collector currents and emitter voltages...