Please share your own experience. For me, all the articles were accepted after a revision if the journal was with an impact factor and non paid.
Without any need of revision - I think it is les than 10%.
Regards
G
I can't imagine that a quality journal would involve reviewers and these would not ask for any revision, even a minor one. All my papers had a request for revision. I have reviewed papers myself and one is tempted to find something to show that one really read the paper carefully. So, I recon that only a very minor part of the manuscripts are accepted as such wihtout revision, a few percent...
It is too small of a number to really consider. In the best journal in my field, they have accepted just 2 papers without revision in almost 30 years (~300 papers a year is typical for this journal). In my general field, it seems that for general-case papers in legitimate journals, the reject rate is ~60%, the minor revisions is 5%, and the major revisions are the rest. Accept without revision is in the margin of error somewhere.
hi ajitasnhu,
u can cut down the % to less than 2. Without revision, accepting is highly impossible in the case is with respect to high impact journals..
It would be extraordinarily rare to be accepted for publication without revision of some sort.
This article may help:
Article Acceptance rate and reasons for rejection of manuscripts sub...
Revision of manuscript depend on quality of work. Revision improve the quality. In general SCI journals and paper in conference proceeding may ask for revision. Even Book and Patent ask for revision.
Rarely such occurs- A good journal always improve the manuscript quality through revisions
Depend on journal. In general paper ask for revision or modification
There's no "perfect" in human, revision is part of the learning process. I think the percentage is more than 10%. 😃
If the journal already has an IF then all the papers will subjected to revision. All the best
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Journal Impact Factor