lots is written about Gert Hofstedtes theories see. e.g. Aaron Marcus. Nisbett promotes cultural studies used in several IT studies as well see e.g. Torkil Clemmensen
This work deals with cross-cultural interaction design challenges and so may give you an idea of what is out there -> http://epublications.uef.fi/pub/urn_isbn_978-952-61-0407-2/urn_isbn_978-952-61-0407-2.pdf.
Designing for other cultures: learning tools design in the nasa amerindian context. Human-Computer Etiquette: Cultural Expectations and the Design Implications They Place on Computers and Technology, Boca Raton (USA) : Auerbach Publications, 2010, pp. 115-141, ISBN 9781420069457
As a visitor to France, I was astonished to find that the gap between the British design school and the French design school was wider than the Atlantic! The only thing they have in common is the desire to make useful objects. Their resulting designs are so widely different, because at some stage, a small, fiercely independent, relatively arbitrary design decision is made, resulting in a radically different product. Examples I am thinking of are floodlight stands for stadia, the autocar railway and the minitel: The French expect two poles to hold floodlights, asymmetric autocar driver windows, and cheap database access.