The sand pipe does not come from the Mediterranean, but you do not know the exact origin. The curvature is light but well visible, the dimensions are quite remarkable, but the most unusual feature is the position of the grains.
Photos on internet suggest obligate use of sand grains as building material in tubes of members of the Pectinariidae family. However, this is not the case. These polychaetes use materials depending on local availability (Rouse & Pleijel 2001). Tubes may not only be constructed of sand grains but also of shell fragments and foraminifera, in a one- or two-layered arrangement (see references in Moreno et al 2004). Particles either abut or overlap (Rouse & Pleijel 2001). Tubes are characteristically cone-shaped, often bent like the photo of this question. The tube on the photo is built for a large part by small discs, most probably foram skeletons. So I believe this is a tube of a pectinarian polychaete. It would be nice to know somewhat more of the sampling location and depth.
It's a serpulid worm tube. Go to my ResearchGate page and see this paper: Finger, K.L., Flenniken, M.M., and Lipps, J.H., Foraminifera used in the construction of Miocene polychaete tubes, Monterey Formation, California, USA. Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 38(4): 277–291.
Many of us agree that it is the case of a polychaete of genus Pectinaria, unfortunately we do not have the specimen, it was never found. Two clues remain: most of the shell is build in whit foraminifera, collected from bottom where polychaete lived; furthermore, inside the shell there are dried remains of the specimen, would you be able to withdraw ADN for research in molecular biology?