I've read conflicting reports as to what is considered the most abundant bacterial species on Earth.

I used to think that it was Pelagibacter ubique. Recent reports (like this one in Science: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/344/6182/416.full) suggest that it may actually be some kind of Prochlorococcus. They say that Prochlorococcus is the most abundant genus of photosynthetic bacteria in the oceans, so that's one distinction, but I had thought that the Pelagibacter species were just more abundant in general (see this Nature paper: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v420/n6917/full/nature01240.html).

Is this just a discrepancy between estimates? How reliable are the claims of "most abundant bacteria," really?

More J. Harry Caufield's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions