How to use FITC in correct way for protein staining in an emulsion before fluorescence microscopy ??
Thanks in advance
Dear Sir. Concerning your issue about the suitable method for protein stabilized emulsion sample preparation for fluorescence microscopy. The relative merits of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and lissamine rhodamine (RB 200) as labels for antibody in fluorescence microscopy were studied and compared by microphotometry, testing each fluorochrome under its own optimal conditions as far as possible, and at a similar range of dye:protein ratios. The antibody was sheep anti-human globulin, and the tissues stained with it were rat liver sections bearing human anti-nuclear factor on the nuclei. The findings were as follows:
(i) the amount of RB 200 conjugating with protein was strictly proportional to the amount of the sulphonyl chloride derivative added to the reaction mixture; with increasing amounts of FITC in the reaction mixture, however, there was a less than proportional increase in the degree of conjugation.
(ii) Diethylaminoethyl (DEAE)-cellulose chromatography decreased the dye:protein ratio of the conjugates by 40% uniformly for both RB 200 and FITC, regardless of the initial dye:protein ratio.
(iii) When corrections were made for spectral responses of photo-detectors, effects of optimizing the mountants, and benefits to rhodamine of changing from a Xenon to a mercury lamp, it was concluded that RB 200 conjugates could give brighter staining than FITC conjugates at similar dye:protein ratios.
(iv) DEAE-cellulose chromatography greatly improved the contrast of the staining, especially with RB 200 conjugates.
(v) After chromatography, RB 200 consistently gave better contrast than FITC.
(vi) The fluorescence of rhodamine-stained sections did not fade demonstrably when irradiated for several minutes with green light.
(vii) The fluorescence of FITC-stained sections faded rapidly when irradiated with ultra-violet (u.v.)+blue light. The fluorescence appeared to contain two components, one fading with first-order kinetics with a half-life of about a minute under the experimental conditions used and the other not fading at all.
(viii) Raising the pH improved the fluorescence of FITC-stained sections but did not affect rates of fading.
(ix) Narrow-band excitation of FITC-stained sections with blue light instead of u.v.+blue reduced the rate of fading and the fluorescence intensity by equal amounts, an effect presumably due merely to loss of excitation intensity.
I think the following below links may help you in your analysis:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1555036/pdf/immunology00240-0179.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.465.1008&rep=rep1&type=pdf
http://www.finbionet.fi/ils/courses/docs_img_15/Sample_preparation_lecture_2015
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3972669/
Thanks
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Medicine
- Disease
- Infectious Diseases