The answer supplied by George Benneh Mensah below pretty much highlights the stakes involved for academics worldwide. The above question begs more questions in the context of widespread AI deployment.
What is a SOBJECT (enmeshment between natural and artificial) AUTHORSHIP?
A poststructuralist conception of authorship challenges the traditional notion of a stable, singular, and authoritative author. In the context of the h-Index, which quantifies the impact and productivity of a researcher's work, a poststructuralist perspective could introduce several considerations that reconfigure how the index is interpreted:
Multiplicity and Fragmentation of Authorship: Poststructuralism emphasizes the multiplicity and fragmentation of authorial voices. In the context of academic research, this could mean acknowledging the collaborative and multifaceted nature of knowledge production. The h-index, which traditionally attributes impact to an individual author, might need to adapt to recognize collaborative efforts involving multiple contributors, both human and possibly even AI. Intertextuality and Networked Authorship: Poststructuralist thought highlights intertextuality, the interconnectedness of texts. In academic research, this could be reflected in the h-index by recognizing the networked nature of authorship. Instead of a linear progression of individual authorship, the h-index might consider the relational impact of authors within broader networks and interdisciplinary collaborations. Deconstruction of Authorial Identity: Poststructuralism challenges the stability of authorial identity. The h-index, which is often tied to the identity of an individual researcher, might need to adapt to a more fluid understanding of authorial identity. This could involve recognizing contributions from researchers who may not fit traditional authorship norms or who engage in interdisciplinary work that challenges disciplinary boundaries. Agency and Power Dynamics: Poststructuralist perspectives highlight issues of power and agency. The h-index, as a quantitative measure, may be seen as reinforcing certain power dynamics in academia. Reconfiguring the h-index from a poststructuralist standpoint might involve considering the ethical implications of how impact metrics contribute to hierarchies and disparities within the academic community. Recognition of Non-Traditional Contributions: Poststructuralism encourages a reevaluation of what constitutes valid and valuable contributions. The h-index, traditionally focused on citations and publications, might need to consider alternative forms of scholarly impact, such as contributions to open-access resources, public engagement, or the development of innovative methodologies. Ethics of Measurement: Poststructuralist perspectives emphasize the ethics of measurement and categorization. The h-index, as a quantitative metric, may raise questions about how impact is measured and whether such measurement aligns with ethical considerations. This could involve a more reflexive and critical approach to the use and interpretation of impact metrics. Reader Participation and Engagement: Poststructuralism emphasizes the active role of readers in constructing meaning. Reconfiguring the h-index from this perspective might involve considering not only the number of citations but also the engagement and impact of research on diverse audiences, both within and outside academia. It's important to note that the h-index is just one of many metrics used to assess academic impact, and discussions about its limitations and potential biases are ongoing. A poststructuralist conception of authorship adds another layer of complexity to these discussions, prompting a reevaluation of how impact metrics reflect the dynamic and evolving nature of academic knowledge production.
The issue of Authorship disrupts the global ecosystem of universities.
For more please refer to following questions:
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_CURATING_and_PROMPTING_the_NEW_FORMS_of_CYBORG_SOBJECT_enmeshment_of_SUBJECT_OBJECT_AUTHORSHIP
https://www.researchgate.net/post/In_the_Context_of_AI_what_is_the_ONTOLOGY_of_the_UNIVERSITY_and_WHY_at_some_stage_universities_NEEDto_return_to_their_ROOTS