Hello ZAA, I do research on the teaching and learning of my students in a matriculation college, so that I can improve their learning. I have NOT always had strong correlations or high p-values in my stats analyses, but I believe that it's reasonably ROBUST. (You can see my papers on RG.)
My head will check the raw data on hard copy questionnaires, and I send him the output of my SPSS analyses mainly because we may want to repeat the same research on future batches of students. When research is ethically carried out, we may hope that the work benefits the organisation now ad in the future. We are not just doing research to write papers, but to contribute to the development of our education management. Thanks, have a good day.
Thank you for your reply. In fact, you are doing good research and using modern computing facilities (SPSS). It is well-known that the statistical indicators are very important and useful in teaching and learning. So my question is about the robustness of these indicators. I suggest you to read any paper or my papers on the topic of indicators.