What is the level of importance of analyzing current public sentiment and shaping citizens' awareness through political marketing and government-controlled media in the context of economic policy pursued?
Can an economic policy conducted mainly on the basis of analyzing current public sentiment and shaping citizens' awareness through information campaigns implemented by government-controlled meanstream media and through activities carried out as part of political marketing be realistically pro-social in strategic, multi-year terms?
According to the saying "the glass is half full or half empty", the description of certain economic processes in the government-controlled media as part of the pro-government information policy is presented in a certain way according to the needs arising from the goals of political marketing. Besides, according to the proverb and the question at the same time: "what comes first the egg or the chicken?" then the following research question can be formulated: Is it first the sluggish economic growth, the downturn in the economy within the framework of business cycles that generates the demand for the development of new strategies for the country's socio-economic development, within which certain interventionist anti-crisis instruments for stimulating economic growth are applied, including, first and foremost, the instruments of soft fiscal policy and dovish monetary policy? Or is it rather the reverse order, i.e., first a specific anti-crisis and/or pro-development, expansionary, pro-investment economic policy is applied and then a recovery in the economy occurs and sometimes an economic crisis also occurs, triggered by a misapplied, specific socio-economic development strategy of the country? Or do one and the other formula of the aforementioned causal sequences also work only alternately, i.e. usually in other periods, other consecutive years, phases of business cycles? In conducting discussions and debates on this issue, there may be different opinions, different theses and claims formulated by economists representing different camps of views on specific areas of economic policy and the legitimacy of the application and effectiveness of specific, individual instruments of fiscal, sectoral, social, etc. policies conducted by the government, as well as monetary policy conducted by the central bank. An election cycle of several years may be correlated with the country's socio-economic development strategy, anti-crisis and pro-development policies planned for several years, and perhaps also with the business cycle of several years of changes in the rate of economic growth, etc. The issue of the interventionist application of anti-crisis and pro-development economic policy instruments based on the Keynsian model of stimulating the economy through new state-funded investment and/or Milton Friedman's monetarist model proved particularly relevant during the various economic crises that occurred in the past. However, when, instead of new investments, most of the funds within the state's public finances are used for current purposes, social programs with increasing levels of debt in the system of state finances then this kind of economic policy in a few years' perspective can, after a short period of recovery of economic processes, lead to an even deeper crisis. In addition, when many new government programs of subsidies, benefits, subsidies, pensions, etc. are financed with printed money without coverage the result can be an increase in inflation and then a recession in the economy. Such a situation is currently occurring in some countries resulting in a significant decline in economic growth and an increase in unemployment in 2023. The change in public sentiment, levels of spending, consumption and labor force participation may also be influenced by citizens' awareness of the situation in the economy shaped by economic news reported in the meanstream media, which may be controlled by the government pursuing a specific economic policy and a specific information policy through political marketing and pro-government propaganda in the media. The psychology of citizens' consumer behavior influencing the decisions of entrepreneurs to change the scale of their business activities may change under the influence of government information policy shaped in the media. Analysis of current public sentiment is carried out on behalf of government agencies and the Prime Minister's Office usually through surveys and analysis of the sentiment of citizens' opinions expressed on various topics on social media websites and various discussion forums, and analyzed using analytics based on ICT information technology and Big Data Analytcs.
In view of the above, I address the following question to the esteemed community of researchers and scientists:
Can economic policy conducted mainly on the basis of analysis of current public sentiment and the formation of citizens' awareness through information campaigns implemented by government-controlled meanstream media and through activities carried out as part of political marketing be realistically pro-social in strategic, long-term terms?
What is the level of importance of analyzing current public sentiment and shaping citizen awareness through political marketing and government-controlled media in the context of economic policy?
And what is your opinion on this subject?
What do you think about this topic?
Please answer,
I invite everyone to join the discussion,
Thank you very much,
Warm regards,
Dariusz Prokopowicz
Dear Darius,
And everyone.
Apparently, endorphin doses auto functionally, happens to be produced by Myasin in our system, I mean through Cortex in Brain functioning. The such activationsm Incurs at the aftermath of Injuries or exhilaration of anxiety attacks, and back we raise up to our mentally capacitation level of our being. Here I seem to sense the such in both of our cases, of over and again going through re-emphasizing on political, social, and economic mending process. (Data On my profile.)
Well, the glass is not in half level with substance to be stated either half full or either half entry, it looks to be left with barely a drop, at the bottom, so it's empty or to be tipped over to see the last drop. Since you are in proverb, mood I threw up truth with humour, surely will catch your mood in good sense.
"Chicken or the Egg"? Rather it's egg. I with speculation, of the chemistry of germination process, for the knowledgeable of formation to being through mutation, let's conclude, it was an egg 1st came into being and with atomic chemicalisation auto formulae, and for the vast nuclei combust egg fertilised then hatched into chick, grew up into a chicken.
Then furthermore, speculation of how then more hens and roasters came into being.? It's a "mere go round".
However, to the current crises, one big system formation is must, with all aspects comes under one umbrella system. It's doable since our world is very advanced in the recent years, surely will be better in monitoring and to recent exploitation. The rock is too get the specialists to work in collaboration in an agreement.
Climate issues, fiscal development, population, health, poverty and science, IT and academic knowledge expansions, learning and applying while serving justice to all, managing and guiding all beings and aspect needs to be under one global system. The separatism is the biggest problem causer. Otherwise, we just repeatedly reiterate over and again.
Regards,
Fatema Miah
Worse concern is, What is USA up to?
USA is an unspoken Empire, runs by TS military and nuclear power.
When you talk about public sentiment, it's USA has no value towards sentiment of any groups, public or opposition, foreign or oppressed group. USA stood up with power, intimidating. USA core to international crises.
Crises we are talking about, from recession it's looks to be tuning in to Great Depression.
USAs WAR ship, world's biggest WARship arrived to South coast England. France making urge to China to side France for War. What is to anticipate, not 3rd world war.
Regards
Fatema Miah
Am only able to identify a key level of importance of current public sentiment analysis and political marketing, with respect to elections and government change, dear Dariusz Prokopowicz However, I would agree to the methodical framework that economic policy making should be very aware of the social context in a respective polity. In this sense, the physical resources of a country do matter as much as the human resources.
Conference Paper Sociology a la Comte?
Stephen I. Ternyik
Physical resources of country matters, yes.
A country? It's the sentimental triggering point.
For equality and justice resources needs to be brough into one entity.
Distribution is the matter when it comes to justice.
Resourceful countries weren't given fair share, and brought to such inequality inbalancement resulting to climatic unrepairable damage and deprivation. Hit hard on economy, because the resources falling short of, by exploitation.
The sociel context, sentiment in economic policy making is must, as always I agree with you.
Fatema
Sentiment -
economy -
Yes, war must stop !!!
https://youtu.be/Nw9Pw_ebGso
Ideally, in a politically free society with a free enterprise economy, the societal economic/freedom needs are expressed at both the ballot box and in the marketplace. I agree with @Stephen Ternyik that all resources -- human and material -- need be combined optimally to meet Society's needs.
In developing country's, political sentiments tend to have a bearing on economic policy direction of a country, however after election, few promises are fulfilled. The professional sometimes are affected by incoming governments hence unable to optimally utilise their knowledge on economic policy
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Geoscience
- Asia
- India