I agree that genetic variability is an important consideration. However, you must ask yourself the following question: at what cost ? In other words, do you have the financial resources to test it on a continuous basis ?
One must be careful in weed biocontrol not to introduce more genetic variability than what was tested in the original population source that was introduced, otherwise the possibility for non-target impacts may rear its unwanted head. Genetic variability can be a double edged sword, providing genetic stability and adaptibility in a novel environment, or the ability to evolve while invading and acquire new non-target host shifts.
Most natural enemies are species specific especially the parasotiods. Their performance is often affected by for example existence of several biotypes of a pest in one place or presence of a different biotype in another geographical location. Motsly NE takes a little longer as compared to the pests to adapt and change their feeding preferences. If its not carefully evaluated it has impaired the performance of several Biocontrol agents.